Techno-economic comparisons of CO 2 compression and liquefaction processes with distillation columns for high purity and recovery

Pyeong-Gon Jung,Semie Kim,Young-Il Lim,Hyojoon Kim,Hung-Man Moon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104113
IF: 4.4
2024-03-17
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Abstract:CO 2 compression and liquefaction (CCL) requires recovery to be optimized under purity constraints for transportation and storage to minimize costs. CCL processes that operate at 1 million t/y were techno-economically analyzed to evaluate the levelized cost of CO 2 liquefaction (LCCL) and to examine the effect of carbon taxes on the LCCL. The processes included multistage compressors, temperature swing adsorption (TSA) for dehydration, and distillation columns for impurity removal. The same purity constraints were applied to four CCL processes that produce liquid CO 2 at 80 bar and 40 °C: ( i ) a CCL process without a distillation column (Reference case), and CCL processes with distillation columns placed after ( ii ) the seventh compressor (Case 1), ( iii ) the sixth compressor (Case 2), and ( iv ) the TSA unit (Case 3). The reference case failed to meet purity requirements, delivering an LCCL of $16/t-CO 2 . On the other hand, Case 1 was the most cost-efficient among the three cases, delivering a minimum LCCL of $22/t-CO 2 at a recovery of 93 %, which is consistent with usual costs ($13–25/t-CO 2 ). Charging a carbon tax of $100/t-CO 2 on CO 2 emissions during the CCL process increased the minimum LCCL to $25/t-CO 2 for Case 1 and shifted the optimum recovery to 96 %.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical, environmental,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?