Abstract:Quantum mechanics emerged as the result of a successful resolution of stringent empirical and profound conceptual conflicts within the development of atomic physics at the beginning of the last century. At first glance, it seems to be bizarre and even ridiculous to apply ideas of quantum physics in order to improve current psychological and linguistic or semantic ideas. However, a closer look shows that there are some parallels in the development of quantum physics and advanced theories of cognitive science. In psychology, geometric models of meaning have a long tradition. However, they suffer from many shortcomings which are illustrated by discussing several puzzles of bounded rationality. In the first part of this article, we argue that the present account of quantum cognition - taking quantum probabilities rather than classical probabilities - can give a more systematic description of these puzzles than the alternate and rather eclectic treatments in the traditional framework of bounded rationality. Unfortunately, the quantum probabilistic treatment does not always and does not automatically provide a deeper understanding and a true explanation of these puzzles. In the second part of this article, we explain the foundational issue from the perspective of Piron, Foulis, Randall, and others, and we apply it to the foundation of quantum cognition. In this connection, we show that quantum probabilities are of (virtual) conceptual necessity if grounded in an abstract algebraic framework of orthomodular lattices. This framework is motivated by assuming partial Boolean algebras (describing particular perspectives) that are combined into a uniform system while considering certain capacity restrictions. It is at this point that one important aspect of the whole idea of bounded rationality directly enters the theoretical scenery of quantum cognition: resource limitation.

The quantum approach to human reasoning does explain the belief-bias effect

Quantum Structure in Cognition and the Foundations of Human Reasoning

A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning

Modeling Human Decision-making: An Overview of the Brussels Quantum Approach

Quantum Look at two Common Logics: the Logic of Primitive Thinking and the Logic of Everyday Human Reasoning

Psychological 'double-slit experiment' in decision making: Quantum versus classical

Descriptive and Foundational Aspects of Quantum Cognition

A Quantum Dynamic Belief Decision Making Model.

QuLBIT: Quantum-Like Bayesian Inference Technologies for Cognition and Decision

Reconciling Irrational Human Behavior with AI based Decision Making: A Quantum Probabilistic Approach

Quantum mechanics, Bayes' theorem and the conjunction fallacy

Quantum Probabilities as Behavioral Probabilities

How brains make decisions

Neural Mechanisms of the Belief-bias Effect Based on Dual Process Theories

Quantum cognition based on an ambiguous representation derived from a rough set approximation

Quantum formalism for cognitive psychology

Classical Logical versus Quantum Conceptual Thought: Examples in Economics, Decision theory and Concept Theory

Nondistributivity of human logic and violation of response replicability effect in cognitive psychology

Mathematical Structure of Quantum Decision Theory

On the Foundations of the Brussels Operational-Realistic Approach to Cognition

A model of quantum-like decision-making with applications to psychology and cognitive science