Abstract:This paper discusses an interested party who wishes to influence the behavior of agents in a game (multi-agent interaction), which is not under his control. The interested party cannot design a new game, cannot enforce agents' behavior, cannot enforce payments by the agents, and cannot prohibit strategies available to the agents. However, he can influence the outcome of the game by committing to non-negative monetary transfers for the different strategy profiles that may be selected by the agents. The interested party assumes that agents are rational in the commonly agreed sense that they do not use dominated strategies. Hence, a certain subset of outcomes is implemented in a given game if by adding non-negative payments, rational players will necessarily produce an outcome in this subset. Obviously, by making sufficiently big payments one can implement any desirable outcome. The question is what is the cost of implementation? In this paper we introduce the notion of k-implementation of a desired set of strategy profiles, where k stands for the amount of payment that need to be actually made in order to implement desirable outcomes. A major point in k-implementation is that monetary offers need not necessarily materialize when following desired behaviors. We define and study k-implementation in the contexts of games with complete and incomplete information. In the latter case we mainly focus on the VCG games. Our setting is later extended to deal with mixed strategies using correlation devices. Together, the paper introduces and studies the implementation of desirable outcomes by a reliable party who cannot modify game rules (i.e. provide protocols), complementing previous work in mechanism design, while making it more applicable to many realistic CS settings.

Implementation without commitment in moral hazard environments

Randomisation with moral hazard: a path to existence of optimal contracts

Compromise, Don't Optimize: Generalizing Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium to Allow for Ambiguity

Flexible Moral Hazard Problems

Intermediated Implementation

Commitment contracts with action constraints

K-Implementation

Efficient dynamic mechanisms with interdependent valuations.

Moral Hazard with Heterogeneous Beliefs

Implementation with Uncertain Evidence

Moral Hazard, Dynamic Incentives, and Ambiguous Perceptions

Time-inconsistent contract theory

Implementations of Cooperative Games Under Non-Cooperative Solution Concepts

Commitment games with conditional information disclosure

Robust Implementation with Costly Information

Simple Delegated Choice

Equivalent Choice Functions and Stable Mechanisms

Consequentialist conditional cooperation in social dilemmas with imperfect information

Nonstandard Choice In Matching Markets

Choice overload, coordination and inequality: three hurdles to the effectiveness of the compensation mechanism?

The reciprocity set