Commitment contracts with action constraints

Raghul S. Venkatesh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-024-00369-7
2024-11-07
Review of Economic Design
Abstract:I study incentives for commitment in decision-making protocols with coordination motives and action constraints. In the baseline protocol with no commitment, an informed agent sends a cheap talk message to an uninformed principal, and then both players choose actions simultaneously. I study a direct mechanism for the coordination problem (Myerson in J Math Econ 10:67–81, 1982) where the principal commits ex ante to a type contingent action rule. I completely characterize the " optimal contract ." I show that introducing full commitment improves the welfare of both players. When full commitment is not feasible, I analyze a sequential contract in which the principal's commitment is partial. The sequential contract improves welfare compared to the no-commitment case but does worse than the full-commitment contract. Implications of varying the level of commitment for the principal are discussed in the context of decision-making and coordination in strategic military alliances.
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?