Abstract:The KLM approach to defeasible reasoning introduces a weakened form of implication into classical logic. This allows one to incorporate exceptions to general rules into a logical system, and for old conclusions to be withdrawn upon learning new contradictory information. Standpoint logics are a group of logics, introduced to the field of Knowledge Representation in the last 5 years, which allow for multiple viewpoints to be integrated into the same ontology, even when certain viewpoints may hold contradicting beliefs. In this paper, we aim to integrate standpoints into KLM propositional logic in a restricted setting. We introduce the logical system of Defeasible Restricted Standpoint Logic (DRSL) and define its syntax and semantics. Specifically, we integrate ranked interpretations and standpoint structures, which provide the semantics for propositional KLM and propositional standpoint logic respectively, in order to introduce ranked standpoint structures for DRSL. Moreover, we extend the non-monotonic entailment relation of rational closure from the propositional KLM case to the DRSL case. The main contribution of this paper is to characterize rational closure for DRSL both algorithmically and semantically, showing that rational closure can be characterized through a single representative ranked standpoint structure. Finally, we conclude that the semantic and algorithmic characterizations of rational closure are equivalent, and that entailment-checking for DRSL under rational closure is in the same complexity class as entailment-checking for propositional KLM.

An Update Semantics for Defeasible Obligations

Defeasible deontic logic: arguing about permission and obligation

Impossible and Conflicting Obligations in Justification Logic

Conditional Probability Meets Update Logic.

Dynamic Logic of Preference Upgrade.

A logical theory for conditional weak ontic necessity based on context update

On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method.

Handling defeasibilities in action domains

Priority Structures in Deontic Logic

Deontic Logic And Preference Change

Prioritized Norms in Formal Argumentation

From Classical to Non-monotonic Deontic Logic Using ASPIC$$^+$$

De Re Updates

Towards Propositional KLM-Style Defeasible Standpoint Logics

Precision Measurements of Stretching and Compression in Fluid Mixing

Explaining Non-monotonic Normative Reasoning using Argumentation Theory with Deontic Logic

A Usage-Aware Sequent Calculus for Differential Dynamic Logic

A Defeasible Deontic Calculus for Resolving Norm Conflicts

Is Defeasible Logic Applicable

Interdefinability of defeasible logic and logic programming under the well-founded semantics

A Brief History of Updates of Answer-Set Programs