Abstract:Purpose We expand the recent literature on the dynamics of capital structure decisions by investigating the impact of national culture on firms' optimal debt ratios and their dynamic re-adjustment process. To this end, we aim at estimating firm-specific speeds of leverage adjustment, allowing for heterogeneous dynamics in firms' capital structure. Design/methodology/approach We use dynamic panel data estimators to analyze the impact of cultural factors on the dynamics of debt ratios. Findings We show that national culture affects the optimal level of leverage and the dynamic rebalancing of debt ratios, both directly and indirectly, by altering the effect of firm characteristics and macroeconomic factors on firms' financing behavior. Firms converge faster towards the optimal leverage in countries with a stronger attitude to conform with the norm, while they are slower where there is a higher propensity to intellectual autonomy. A higher risk aversion and long-run propensity induce over-levered firms to reduce leverage faster, making the adjustment process strongly asymmetric. Moreover, national culture also produces indirect effects by mitigating the impact of asymmetric information on capital structure decisions. Indeed, firms in more individualistic countries display a lower speed of adjustment and a stronger effect of firm characteristics associated with higher agency costs. On the contrary, firms in countries with a higher tendency to conform to social norms, less individualistic and more long-term oriented have a higher adjustment speed and appear to suffer less from agency issues. Our results therefore highlight how national culture affects agency problems within firms, thus suggesting the adoption of country-specific corporate governance provisions accounting for the effects of local cultural traits on managers' behavior. Originality/value We expand the capital structure and governance literature by showing how cultural traits impact on the dynamics of debt ratios. In particular, we show how cultural traits may mitigate or exacerbate the role of agency issues on firms' behavior, hence suggesting that cultural factors may interact with governance rules in shaping firms' decisions. Therefore, our work highlights how policy-makers should include cultural aspects when defining regulation concerning corporate governance.

Lenders' culture and the pricing of public corruption in corporate loans: evidence from the United States

Perceptions of corporate corruption culture and debt contracting

CEO Power, Bank Risk-Taking and National Culture: International Evidence

Chief Executive Officer's national culture and bank risk‐taking behavior: International evidence

Local public corruption and corporate debt concentration: evidence from US firms

Lending corruption and bank loan contracting: Cross-Country evidence

How Does Culture Influence Corporate Risk-Taking?

How Does Culture Influence Firm Risk Taking?

The Cultural Origins of CEO Overconfidence

Does corporate culture impact audit pricing? Evidence from textual analysis

Cultural Values and Corporate Risk-Taking

National culture and capital structure dynamics

National Culture and International Differences in the Cost of Equity Capital

Which Works Better: Public Choice or Social Choice?

Bank capital, liquidity creation and the moderating role of bank culture: An investigation using a machine learning approach

Effects of National Culture on Bank Risk-Taking Behavior

Culture, business environment and SMEs' profitability: Evidence from European Countries

National culture: The missing country-level determinant of corporate governance

Culture, openness, and finance

How Does Corporate Culture Affect IPO Price Formation?

Risk Culture of Banks and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies