P252 Male Genitourinary Dysfunction after Minimally Invasive and Open Ileoanal Pouch
O Hernandez Dominguez,C Prien,R Almarzooqi,H Sanchetti,O Lavryk,J Somovilla,A Kanters,D Liska,E Gorgun,T Hull,S Steele,S Holubar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0382
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical treatment for IBD or FAP. As these diseases often manifest during adolescence or early adulthood, treatment effects on genitourinary function (GU), sexual function, and fertility are of paramount importance. However, the difference in male GU function and sexual function after minimally invasive IPAA (MIS-IPAA) compared to open-IPAA are unclear. We conducted an observational survey to compare long-term GU functionality in male patients’ post MIS-IPAA or open-IPAA. Methods All adult male patients who underwent IPAA at a single tertiary hospital between 1983 and 2023 were identified, and demographics and clinical data were obtained from our prospectively maintained pouch registry. Patients were surveyed using validated questionnaires (Table 1). The primary outcome was the composite survey scores. Patients were stratified into MIS-IPAA (laparoscopic, robotic, single-incision surgery) or open-IPAA groups based on the mode of pelvic/rectal dissection. Reoperative IPAA procedures (revisions, redo, and excisions), incomplete surveys, patients with permanent ileostomy, and status post prostatectomy were excluded. Results A total of 1,836 patients were surveyed, and 457 (24.9%) submitted a response. After exclusion criteria, 296 responses were analyzed: 236 (79.7%) open-IPAA and 60 (20.3%) MIS-IPAA. In both groups, most patients had ulcerative colitis (88 vs. 89%). Compared to open-IPAA, MIS-IPAA had a similar age at surgery (40.6 vs. 40.9, p=0.88), younger age at survey (48.2 vs 58.2, p<0.001), and shorter interval between surgery and survey (7.7 vs. 17.4, p<0.001). Male MIS-IPAA patients were able to achieve orgasm more successfully than those with open-IPAA (5 vs. 4, p=0.001). No significant difference was observed between MIS- and open-IPAA in erectile function (SHIM score 22.5 vs 21, p=0.22), IBD-specific male sexual dysfunction (IBD-MSDS, 3 vs. 2, p=0.19), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) (CLLS, 4 vs. 6, p=0.16), or use of therapeutic aids for sexual activity (6 vs. 6, p=0.7). There was no difference in global quality of life (CGQoL, 0.83 vs 0.80, p=0.6). There were no differences between the patients who had difficulty conceiving a child (4 vs. 7, p=0.46) and those who experienced infertility (1 vs. 2, p=0.54). Patients experiencing infertility showed no difference in quality of life between the MIS- and open-IPAA groups (FertiQoL, 84.9 vs 85.9, p=0.64). Conclusion Minimally invasive IPAA had a higher preservation of orgasm ability than did open IPAA. There was no difference in erectile function, LUTS, need for therapeutic aids for sexual function, or fertility between MIS and open approach to pelvic dissection in IPAA.
gastroenterology & hepatology