Abstract:Surrogacy law in the United States has evolved significantly in the last several decades. Unlike many other countries, surrogacy is the subject of state-by-state regulation in the United States rather than the federal government. In 1986, the New Jersey Supreme Court declared that contracts for the purpose of traditional surrogacy are against public policy and will not be enforced. A few years after the Baby M case, the New York state legislature passed a law criminalizing surrogacy. Thirty years later, both New Jersey and New York also reversed course and recently legalized compensated surrogacy. The trend from prohibition to permission of surrogacy has been occurring in many states around the country. There are several explanations for this change. The first relates to the advances of medical technology. The Baby M case involved a “traditional” or “genetic” surrogacy, whereas with the increased availability of in-vitro fertilization, gestational surrogacy is more common. Besides medical technology, other reasons also explain trend to legalize compensated surrogacy. The debates around the recent New York legislation are emblematic of the new national politics around surrogacy in the United States today. First, a new powerful lobby of gay men and other members of the LGBTQI community pushed for legalization of surrogacy in New York. Second, while in the 1980s much of the feminist opinion on surrogacy was opposed to it, a new feminist perspective in favor of surrogacy was injected into the debates. However, consistent with their positions over the last thirty-years, certain feminists and Catholic groups continued to oppose legalization. Third, another important voice in the conversation is RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association (Resolve), which also supported surrogacy legalization in New York and other states.There is no consistent approach to surrogacy across the U.S. states. The general trend among states is to explicitly legalize compensated surrogacy contracts through statute. The statutes are not uniform across the country. They differ, for example, in regard to who can be an intended parent and the rights and responsibilities of the surrogate. Even where there is no statute legalizing surrogacy contracts, courts may still enforce them. Courts may also permit intended parents to obtain orders naming them on the birth certificate of the child. Despite the trend, a few states have continued to prohibit surrogacy. In this chapter, I trace the changing perspectives in the U.S. courts on surrogacy. I provide an overview of the various legal approaches to surrogacy across U.S. states today. I conclude with a case study of the debates surrounding the legalization of surrogacy in New York. Although the dynamics vary from state-to-state, the general trend is to legalize surrogacy. Anti-feminist and religious organizations are often active in opposing efforts to legalize, but other feminist groups, LGBTQI organizations and advocates for infertile people have support efforts to legalize it, The positions of the various interest groups participating in the legislative process in New York reflect the new national perspectives on surrogacy.

In Re Baby M, 31 March 1987

Parenthood and Cross-Border Surrogacy: What Is ‘New’? The ECtHR’s First Advisory Opinion

Surrogacy in the United States: From Prohibition to Permission

Best Interests of the Child: Research on Parenthood in Surrogacy Disputes Chinese Full Text

The right to be born: surrogacy and the legal control of human fertility

C. v. S., 25 February 1987

The Perceptions of New Zealand Lawyers and Social Workers About Children Being Adopted by Gay Couples and Lesbian Couples

International Surrogacy Arrangements: Recent Developments and Ongoing Problems

Recognition of the parent-child relationship as a result of surrogacy and the best interest of the child

Protection of fundamental rights in the context of surrogacy: A review of the recent case law of the European court of human rights

The European Court of Human Rights Shaping Family Life in Cross-border Surrogacy: The Paradiso et Campanelli Case

LEGAL CONTROVERSIES IN CROSS-BORDER SURROGACY: A CENTRAL EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE RECOGNITION OF LEGAL PARENTHOOD THROUGH SURROGACY ESTABLISHED ABROAD

Accommodations of private and family life and non-traditional families: the limits of deference in cases of cross-border surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights

[The proposal for a regulation on the recognition of parenthood: An attempt to recognize surrogacy in the European Union?]

Surrogacy and the significance of gestation: Implications for law and policy

PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN BORN BY SURROGATE MOTHERS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

The March 2021 Italian constitutional court ruling on surrogacy: a prelude to common European legislation for the sake of reproductive health?

10 years of controversy, twists and turns in the Perruche wrongful life claim: compensation for children born with a disability in France

[Is there still a future for the French "Perruche" jurisprudence?]

Legal principles and essential surrogacy cases every practitioner should know

(Mis)regulation--the case of commercial surrogacy