Abstract:Surrogacy law in the United States has evolved significantly in the last several decades. Unlike many other countries, surrogacy is the subject of state-by-state regulation in the United States rather than the federal government. In 1986, the New Jersey Supreme Court declared that contracts for the purpose of traditional surrogacy are against public policy and will not be enforced. A few years after the Baby M case, the New York state legislature passed a law criminalizing surrogacy. Thirty years later, both New Jersey and New York also reversed course and recently legalized compensated surrogacy. The trend from prohibition to permission of surrogacy has been occurring in many states around the country. There are several explanations for this change. The first relates to the advances of medical technology. The Baby M case involved a “traditional” or “genetic” surrogacy, whereas with the increased availability of in-vitro fertilization, gestational surrogacy is more common. Besides medical technology, other reasons also explain trend to legalize compensated surrogacy. The debates around the recent New York legislation are emblematic of the new national politics around surrogacy in the United States today. First, a new powerful lobby of gay men and other members of the LGBTQI community pushed for legalization of surrogacy in New York. Second, while in the 1980s much of the feminist opinion on surrogacy was opposed to it, a new feminist perspective in favor of surrogacy was injected into the debates. However, consistent with their positions over the last thirty-years, certain feminists and Catholic groups continued to oppose legalization. Third, another important voice in the conversation is RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association (Resolve), which also supported surrogacy legalization in New York and other states.There is no consistent approach to surrogacy across the U.S. states. The general trend among states is to explicitly legalize compensated surrogacy contracts through statute. The statutes are not uniform across the country. They differ, for example, in regard to who can be an intended parent and the rights and responsibilities of the surrogate. Even where there is no statute legalizing surrogacy contracts, courts may still enforce them. Courts may also permit intended parents to obtain orders naming them on the birth certificate of the child. Despite the trend, a few states have continued to prohibit surrogacy. In this chapter, I trace the changing perspectives in the U.S. courts on surrogacy. I provide an overview of the various legal approaches to surrogacy across U.S. states today. I conclude with a case study of the debates surrounding the legalization of surrogacy in New York. Although the dynamics vary from state-to-state, the general trend is to legalize surrogacy. Anti-feminist and religious organizations are often active in opposing efforts to legalize, but other feminist groups, LGBTQI organizations and advocates for infertile people have support efforts to legalize it, The positions of the various interest groups participating in the legislative process in New York reflect the new national perspectives on surrogacy.

Plenary lecture III: the effect of structural degradation on the dynamic behaviour of buildings

Gestational Surrogacy and Ethical Considerations.

EXAMINING LEGAL REGULATIONS OF THE SURROGACY INSTITUTION: A COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK AND ONGOING CHALLENGES

Surrogacy and the significance of gestation: Implications for law and policy

Surrogacy: An important pathway to parenthood. A call for international standardization.

Global Surrogacy, Exploitation, Human Rights and International Private Law: A Pragmatic Stance and Policy Recommendations

[Dentocleidocranial dysostosis].

Increase in urinary purines and pyrimidines in patients with methylmalonic aciduria combined with homocystinuria.

Surrogacy in the United States: From Prohibition to Permission

LEGAL CONTROVERSIES IN CROSS-BORDER SURROGACY: A CENTRAL EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE RECOGNITION OF LEGAL PARENTHOOD THROUGH SURROGACY ESTABLISHED ABROAD

Protection of fundamental rights in the context of surrogacy: A review of the recent case law of the European court of human rights

Thoughts on the ethics of gestational surrogacy: perspectives from religions, Western liberalism, and comparisons with adoption

Iron absorption after partial gastrectomy. A comparative study on the absorption from ferrous sulphate and hemoglobin.

EXPERIMENTAL HYDROCEPHALUS IN YOUNG DOGS: HISTOLOGICL AND ULTRASTRUCTURAL STUDY OF THE BRAIN TISSUE DAMAGE

International Surrogacy Arrangements: Recent Developments and Ongoing Problems

International private law to regulate commercial global surrogacy practices: Just what are social work’s practical policy recommendations?

Gestational Carrier Pregnancies: Legal and Ethical Considerations for Pediatricians

The March 2021 Italian constitutional court ruling on surrogacy: a prelude to common European legislation for the sake of reproductive health?

The right to be born: surrogacy and the legal control of human fertility

Protection of Children’s Rights and Interests in Transnational Surrogacy -- From the Perspective of Parent-Child Relationship

A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in south American countries: pointing to a need for an international legal framework