Abstract:Bell inequalities were created with the goal of improving the understanding of foundational questions in quantum mechanics. To this end, they are typically applied to measurement results generated from entangled systems of particles. They can, however, also be used as a statistical tool for macroscopic systems, where they can describe the connection strength between two components of a system under a causal model. We show that, in principle, data from macroscopic observations analyzed with Bell’ s approach can invalidate certain causal models. To illustrate this use, we describe a macroscopic game setting, without a quantum mechanical measurement process, and analyze it using the framework of Bell experiments. In the macroscopic game, violations of the inequalities can be created by cheating with classically defined strategies. In the physical context, the meaning of violations is less clear and is still vigorously debated. We discuss two measures for optimal strategies to generate a given statistic that violates the inequalities. We show their mathematical equivalence and how they can be computed from CHSH-quantities alone, if non-signaling applies. As a macroscopic example from the financial world, we show how the unfair use of insider knowledge could be picked up using Bell statistics. Finally, in the discussion of realist interpretations of quantum mechanical Bell experiments, cheating strategies are often expressed through the ideas of free choice and locality. In this regard, violations of free choice and locality can be interpreted as two sides of the same coin, which underscores the view that the meaning these terms are given in Bell’s approach should not be confused with their everyday use. In general, we conclude that Bell’s approach also carries lessons for understanding macroscopic systems of which the connectedness conforms to different causal structures.

A proof of Bell's inequality in quantum mechanics using causal interactions

A simple proof of Bell's inequality

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell

State-Independent Proofs of Bell'S Theorem Without Inequalities and Bell Inequality for Four-Qubit System

Test of the physical significance of Bell nonlocality

Information causality as a tool for bounding the set of quantum correlations

Loophole-free Bell inequality violations cannot disprove local realism

Bell's inequality in relativistic Quantum Field Theory

Bell's inequalities I: An explanation for their experimental violation

Counterfactual restrictions and Bell's theorem

Disproof of Bell's Theorem by Clifford Algebra Valued Local Variables

Bell's theorem in time without inequalities

On Removing the Classical-Quantum Boundary

Single-particle Bell-type Inequality

Bell's Inequalities and Quantum Communication Complexity.

The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning

Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality

Violation of Bell's Inequality in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Form with Entangled Quantum States Revisited

Quantifying and Interpreting Connection Strength in Macro- and Microscopic Systems: Lessons from Bell’s Approach

All Entangled Pure States Violate a Single Bell’s Inequality