Cut-elimination for the mu-calculus with one variable

Grigori Mints,Thomas Studer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.77.7

2012-02-16

Abstract:We establish syntactic cut-elimination for the one-variable fragment of the modal mu-calculus. Our method is based on a recent cut-elimination technique by Mints that makes use of Buchholz' Omega-rule.

Logic in Computer Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Cut-restriction: from cuts to analytic cuts

Agata Ciabattoni,Timo Lang,Revantha Ramanayake

2023-04-28

Abstract:Cut-elimination is the bedrock of proof theory with a multitude of applications from computational interpretations to proof analysis. It is also the starting point for important meta-theoretical investigations including decidability, complexity, disjunction property, and interpolation. Unfortunately cut-elimination does not hold for the sequent calculi of most non-classical logics. It is well-known that the key to applications is the subformula property (a typical consequence of cut-elimination) rather than cut-elimination itself. With this in mind we introduce cut-restriction, a procedure to restrict arbitrary cuts to analytic cuts (when elimination is not possible). The algorithm applies to all sequent calculi satisfying language-independent and simple-to-check conditions, and it is obtained by adapting age-old cut-elimination. Our work encompasses existing results in a uniform way, and establishes novel analytic subformula properties.

Logic in Computer Science
Cut elimination for coherent theories in negation normal form

Paolo Maffezioli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-023-00902-5

2024-01-25

Archive for Mathematical Logic

Abstract:We present a cut-free sequent calculus for a class of first-order theories in negation normal form which include coherent and co-coherent theories alike. All structural rules, including cut, are admissible.

mathematics,logic
A Simple Proof That Super-Consistency Implies Cut Elimination

Gilles Dowek,Olivier Hermant

2023-04-21

Abstract:We give a simple and direct proof that super-consistency implies the cut elimination property in deduction modulo. This proof can be seen as a simplification of the proof that super-consistency implies proof normalization. It also takes ideas from the semantic proofs of cut elimination that proceed by proving the completeness of the cut-free calculus. As an application, we compare our work with the cut elimination theorems in higher-order logic that involve V-complexes.

Logic in Computer Science
A theory of cut-restriction: first steps

Agata Ciabattoni,Timo Lang,Revantha Ramanayake

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.01600

2022-03-03

Abstract:Cut-elimination is the bedrock of proof theory. It is the algorithm that eliminates cuts from a sequent calculus proof that leads to cut-free calculi and applications. Cut-elimination applies to many logics irrespective of their semantics. Such is its influence that whenever cut-elimination is not provable in a sequent calculus the invariable response has been a move to a richer proof system to regain it. In this paper we investigate a radically different approach to the latter: adapting age-old cut-elimination to restrict the shape of the cut-formulas when elimination is not possible. We tackle the "first level" above cut-free: analytic cuts. Our methodology is applied to the sequent calculi for bi-intuitionistic logic and S5 where analytic cuts are already known to be required. This marks the first steps in a theory of cut-restriction.

Logic in Computer Science
Quantifier elimination for o-minimal structures expanded by a valuational cut

Clifton Ealy,Jana Maříková

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.08124

2020-07-16

Abstract:Let $R$ be an o-minimal expansion of a group in a language in which $\textrm{Th}(R)$ eliminates quantifiers, and let $C$ be a predicate for a valuational cut in $R$. We identify a condition that implies quantifier elimination for $\textrm{Th}(R,C)$ in the language of $R$ expanded by $C$ and a small number of constants, and which, in turn, is implied by $\textrm{Th}(R,C)$ having quantifier elimination and being universally axiomatizable. The condition applies for example in the case when $C$ is a convex subring of an o-minimal field $R$ and its residue field is o-minimal.

Logic
Rule-Elimination Theorems

Sayantan Roy

2024-10-05

Abstract:Cut-elimination theorems constitute one of the most important classes of theorems of proof theory. Since Gentzen's proof of the cut-elimination theorem for the system $\mathbf{LK}$, several other proofs have been proposed. Even though the techniques of these proofs can be modified to sequent systems other than $\mathbf{LK}$, they are essentially of a very particular nature; each of them describes an algorithm to transform a given proof to a cut-free proof. However, due to its reliance on heavy syntactic arguments and case distinctions, such an algorithm makes the fundamental structure of the argument rather opaque. We, therefore, consider rules abstractly, within the framework of logical structures familiar from universal logic à la Jean-Yves Béziau, and aim to clarify the essence of the so-called ``elimination theorems''. To do this, we first give a non-algorithmic proof of the cut-elimination theorem for the propositional fragment of $\mathbf{LK}$. From this proof, we abstract the essential features of the argument and define something called ``normal sequent structures'' relative to a particular rule. We then prove two rule-elimination theorems for these and show that one of these has a converse. Abstracting even more, we define ``abstract sequent structures'' and show that for these structures, the corresponding version of the ``rule''-elimination theorem has a converse as well.

Logic
Cut-Simulation and Impredicativity

Christoph Benzmueller,Chad E. Brown,Michael Kohlhase,Chad Brown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2168/lmcs-5(1:6)2009

2009-03-03

Logical Methods in Computer Science

Abstract:<p>We investigate cut-elimination and cut-simulation in impredicative(higher-order) logics. We illustrate that adding simple axioms such as Leibnizequations to a calculus for an impredicative logic -- in our case a sequentcalculus for classical type theory -- is like adding cut. The phenomenonequally applies to prominent axioms like Boolean- and functionalextensionality, induction, choice, and description. This calls for thedevelopment of calculi where these principles are built-in instead of beingtreated axiomatically.</p>

computer science, theory & methods,logic
Contraction Elimination in Sequent Based Ground Equational Calculus

F. Parlamento,F. Previale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.09171

2015-12-31

Abstract:In "Cut Elimination for Gentzen's Sequent Calculus with Equality and Logic of Partial Terms" LNCS 7750,161-172(2013), we have shown that the cut rule is eliminable in two ground equational sequent calculi, to be denoted by EQ_M and EQ'. In this note we prove that the contraction rule is not eliminable in EQ_M but it is eliminable in EQ'.

Logic
On the Cut Elimination of Weak Intuitionistic Tense Logic

Yiheng Wang,Yu Peng,Zhe Lin

2024-05-27

Abstract:In this paper, we use a new method to prove cut-elimination of weak intuitionistic tense logic. This method focuses on splitting the contraction rule and cut rules. Further general theories and applications of this method shall be developed in the future.

Logic,Logic in Computer Science
IMELL Cut Elimination with Linear Overhead

Beniamino Accattoli,Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

2024-05-15

Abstract:Recently, Accattoli introduced the Exponential Substitution Calculus (ESC) given by untyped proof terms for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (IMELL), endowed with rewriting rules at-a-distance for cut elimination. He also introduced a new cut elimination strategy, dubbed the good strategy, and showed that its number of steps is a time cost model with polynomial overhead for the ESC/IMELL, and the first such one.

Logic in Computer Science
On Permuting Cut with Contraction

Mirjana Borisavljevic,Kosta Dosen,Zoran Petric

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/9911065

1999-11-10

Abstract:The paper presents a cut-elimination procedure for intuitionistic propositional logic in which cut is eliminated directly, without introducing the multiple-cut rule mix, and in which pushing cut above contraction is one of the reduction steps. The presentation of this procedure is preceded by an analysis of Gentzen's mix-elimination procedure, made in the perspective of permuting cut with contraction. It is also shown that in the absence of implication, pushing cut above contraction doesn't pose problems for directly eliminating cut.

Logic
Sahlqvist Correspondence for Modal Mu-Calculus

Johan van Benthem,Nick Bezhanishvili,Ian Hodkinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-012-9388-9

2012-01-01

Studia Logica

Abstract:We define analogues of modal Sahlqvist formulas for the modal mu-calculus, and prove a correspondence theorem for them.
Demystifying $μ$

Bahareh Afshari,Graham E. Leigh,Guillermo Menéndez Turata

2024-01-02

Abstract:We develop the theory of illfounded and cyclic proof systems in the context of the modal $\mu$-calculus. A fine analysis of provability and admissibility bridges the finitary, cyclic and illfounded notions of proof for this logic and re-enforces the subtlety of two important normal form theorems: guardedness and disjunctiveness.

Logic,Logic in Computer Science
The New Normal: We Cannot Eliminate Cuts in Coinductive Calculi, But We Can Explore Them

Ekaterina Komendantskaya,Dmitry Rozplokhas,Henning Basold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.03714

2020-08-09

Abstract:In sequent calculi, cut elimination is a property that guarantees that any provable formula can be proven analytically. For example, Gentzen's classical and intuitionistic calculi LK and LJ enjoy cut elimination. The property is less studied in coinductive extensions of sequent calculi. In this paper, we use coinductive Horn clause theories to show that cut is not eliminable in a coinductive extension of LJ, a system we call CLJ. We derive two further practical results from this study. We show that CoLP by Gupta et al. gives rise to cut-free proofs in CLJ with fixpoint terms, and we formulate and implement a novel method of coinductive theory exploration that provides several heuristics for discovery of cut formulae in CLJ.

Logic in Computer Science,Programming Languages
Cut elimination for a logic with induction and co-induction

Alwen Tiu,Alberto Momigliano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2012.07.007

2012-12-01

Journal of Applied Logic

Abstract:Proof search has been used to specify a wide range of computation systems. In order to build a framework for reasoning about such specifications, we make use of a sequent calculus involving induction and co-induction. These proof principles are based on a proof-theoretic (rather than set-theoretic) notion of definition (Hallnäs, 1991 [18], Eriksson, 1991 [11], Schroeder-Heister, 1993 [38], McDowell and Miller, 2000 [22]). Definitions are akin to logic programs, where the left and right rules for defined atoms allow one to view theories as “closed” or defining fixed points. The use of definitions and free equality makes it possible to reason intensionally about syntax. We add in a consistent way rules for pre- and post-fixed points, thus allowing the user to reason inductively and co-inductively about properties of computational system making full use of higher-order abstract syntax. Consistency is guaranteed via cut-elimination, where we give a direct cut-elimination procedure in the presence of general inductive and co-inductive definitions via the parametric reducibility technique.
Expressiveness Results for Timed Modal Mu-Calculi

Rance Cleaveland,Jeroen J.A. Keiren,Peter Fontana

2023-10-06

Abstract:This paper establishes relative expressiveness results for several modal mu-calculi interpreted over timed automata. These mu-calculi combine modalities for expressing passage of (real) time with a general framework for defining formulas recursively; several variants have been proposed in the literature. We show that one logic, which we call $L^{rel}_{\nu,\mu}$, is strictly more expressive than the other mu-calculi considered. It is also more expressive than the temporal logic TCTL, while the other mu-calculi are incomparable with TCTL in the setting of general timed automata.

Logic in Computer Science
Cut elimination for Cyclic Proofs: A Case Study in Temporal Logic

Bahareh Afshari,Johannes Kloibhofer

2024-05-03

Abstract:We consider modal logic extended with the well-known temporal operator `eventually' and provide a cut-elimination procedure for a cyclic sequent calculus that captures this fragment. The work showcases an adaptation of the reductive cut-elimination method to cyclic calculi. Notably, the proposed algorithm applies to a cyclic proof and directly outputs a cyclic cut-free proof without appealing to intermediate machinery for regularising the end proof.

Logic in Computer Science,Logic
Focus-style proofs for the two-way alternation-free $μ$-calculus

Jan Rooduijn,Yde Venema

2023-07-04

Abstract:We introduce a cyclic proof system for the two-way alternation-free modal $\mu$-calculus. The system manipulates one-sided Gentzen sequents and locally deals with the backwards modalities by allowing analytic applications of the cut rule. The global effect of backwards modalities on traces is handled by making the semantics relative to a specific strategy of the opponent in the evaluation game. This allows us to augment sequents by so-called trace atoms, describing traces that the proponent can construct against the opponent's strategy. The idea for trace atoms comes from Vardi's reduction of alternating two-way automata to deterministic one-way automata. Using the multi-focus annotations introduced earlier by Marti and Venema, we turn this trace-based system into a path-based system. We prove that our system is sound for all sequents and complete for sequents not containing trace atoms.

Logic in Computer Science,Logic
Covariant-Contravariant Refinement Modal $μ$-calculus

Huili Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.02989

2022-08-05

Abstract:The notion of covariant-contravariant refinement (CC-refinement, for short) is a generalization of the notions of bisimulation, simulation and refinement. This paper introduces CC-refinement modal $\mu$-calculus (CCRML$^{\mu}$) obtained from the modal $\mu$-calculus system K$^{\mu}$ by adding CC-refinement quantifiers, establishes an axiom system for CCRML$^{\mu}$ and explores the important properties: soundness, completeness and decidability of this axiom system. The language of CCRML$^{\mu}$ may be considered as a specification language for describing the properties of a system referring to reactive and generative actions. It may be used to formalize some interesting problems in the field of formal methods.

Logic in Computer Science,Computation and Language,Formal Languages and Automata Theory
Semantical cut-elimination for the provability logic of true arithmetic

Ryo Kashima,Yutaka Kato

2023-09-12

Abstract:The quasi-normal modal logic GLS is a provability logic formalizing the arithmetical truth. Kushida (2020) gave a sequent calculus for GLS and proved the cut-elimination theorem. This paper introduces semantical characterizations of GLS and gives a semantical proof of the cut-elimination theorem. These characterizations can be generalized to other quasi-normal modal logics.

Logic

Cut-elimination for the mu-calculus with one variable

Cut-restriction: from cuts to analytic cuts

Cut elimination for coherent theories in negation normal form

A Simple Proof That Super-Consistency Implies Cut Elimination

A theory of cut-restriction: first steps

Quantifier elimination for o-minimal structures expanded by a valuational cut

Rule-Elimination Theorems

Cut-Simulation and Impredicativity

Contraction Elimination in Sequent Based Ground Equational Calculus

On the Cut Elimination of Weak Intuitionistic Tense Logic

IMELL Cut Elimination with Linear Overhead

On Permuting Cut with Contraction

Sahlqvist Correspondence for Modal Mu-Calculus

Demystifying $μ$

The New Normal: We Cannot Eliminate Cuts in Coinductive Calculi, But We Can Explore Them

Cut elimination for a logic with induction and co-induction

Expressiveness Results for Timed Modal Mu-Calculi

Cut elimination for Cyclic Proofs: A Case Study in Temporal Logic

Focus-style proofs for the two-way alternation-free $μ$-calculus

Covariant-Contravariant Refinement Modal $μ$-calculus

Semantical cut-elimination for the provability logic of true arithmetic