Abstract:We give a simple and direct proof that super-consistency implies the cut elimination property in deduction modulo. This proof can be seen as a simplification of the proof that super-consistency implies proof normalization. It also takes ideas from the semantic proofs of cut elimination that proceed by proving the completeness of the cut-free calculus. As an application, we compare our work with the cut elimination theorems in higher-order logic that involve V-complexes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to prove that super - consistency implies cut elimination in logical reasoning. Specifically, the authors provide a simple and direct proof method, showing that in the Deduction modulo framework, if a theory is super - consistent, then this theory has the cut - elimination property. This proof method can be regarded as a simplification of the previous proof that super - consistency implies proof normalization, and draws on the semantic method of proving the cut - elimination theorem by proving the completeness of the cut - free calculus.
### Background and Problem Definition
In Deduction modulo, some theories may have non - normalizing proofs. However, it is known that in super - consistent theories, all proofs are normalizing. Super - consistency means that for all truth - value algebras \(B\), the theory has a \(B\)-valued model. In the paper, the authors propose a new proof method, aiming to simplify this process, by replacing the original reducibility candidate set \(C\) and using a simpler truth - value algebra \(S\) to prove that super - consistency implies cut - elimination.
### Main Contributions
1. **Simplified Proof**: The authors propose a new method, which simplifies the proof process by using a simpler truth - value algebra \(S\) to replace the complex reducibility candidate set \(C\).
2. **Combination of Multiple Techniques**: The proof method combines the ideas of proof - term normalization and cut - free calculus completeness, and shows the cut - elimination property by constructing a two - level model.
3. **Application Analysis**: The authors also analyze the cut - elimination theorem in higher - order logic and compare it with other semantic proof methods.
### Technical Details
- **Super - Consistency**: Defined as for all totally - ordered, ordered and complete truth - value algebras \(B\), the theory has a \(B\)-valued model.
- **Truth - Value Algebra**: Defines a structure that contains a set of truth - values, a subset of positive truth - values, operators, etc., and satisfies certain logical rules.
- **Model**: Defines \(B\)-structures and their valuations, as well as the representations of propositions and terms.
- **Cut - Elimination Property**: Defines the concept of cut - free proof, and proves that super - consistency implies cut - elimination property by constructing the truth - value algebra \(S\) and the context algebra \(\Omega\).
### Conclusion
Through the above methods, the authors not only simplify the proof process of super - consistency implies cut - elimination theorem, but also provide a more intuitive and easy - to - understand framework. This not only helps to deeply understand the logical properties in Deduction modulo, but also provides new tools and perspectives for research in related fields.