Third road to the OPERA: a tunnel after all?

Giovanni Amelino-Camelia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.6496
2012-01-31
Abstract:The debate on OPERA focused on two extremes: either "OPERA is wrong" or our formulation of the laws of physics needs a major overhaul. I here argue that some effort should be directed toward manifestations of laws that are already known, but whose implications are poorly understood in OPERA-type contexts. My preferred example of this sort is that the OPERA result might be the first observation of a previously unnoticed effect, belonging to a family of effects which includes those responsible for the well-known peculiar properties of the "tunneling time". Tentative support for this specific hypothesis comes from the presence of evanescence and "postselection", and the observation that the fraction of neutrinos absorbed in rock on the way from CERN to LNGS is of a few parts in $10^5$, i.e. comparable to the fraction of the overall travel time by which OPERA neutrinos are found to reach LNGS earlier than expected. This leads me to stress that the OPERA result is still consistent with subluminality of a suitably "postselection-corrected" velocity. Adopting the popular (but here disfavored) interpretation of the OPERA result as a "signal velocity" one could obtain superluminal values of the postselection-corrected velocity in some technologically feasible OPERA-like setups, a prediction which I propose to test. I also propose a semi-heuristic formula for the "rock dwell time" and find that it gives a result in rough agreement with the OPERA travel-time measurements. This suggests that effects similar to the ones found for OPERA's muon neutrinos should also be found, but with tangibly different magnitude, for muon anti-neutrinos under similar experimental conditions. And I argue that, whether or not they end up being relevant for the OPERA anomaly, the effects here considered should be significant in the Planck-scale realm.
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue related to the superluminal neutrino phenomenon reported by the OPERA experiment. Specifically, the paper explores the following points: 1. **Interpretation of OPERA Experiment Results**: - The paper assumes that the results of the OPERA experiment are correct and proposes a new interpretation, suggesting that this result might be a manifestation of some known physical laws that are not yet fully understood, rather than requiring a major revision of the laws of physics. 2. **Difference Between Pulse Peak Speed and Information Propagation Speed**: - The paper emphasizes that the OPERA experiment actually measured the propagation time of the pulse peak (i.e., the interval between the most likely emission time and the most likely detection time), rather than the information propagation time. This pulse peak speed can exceed the speed of light but does not violate the causality in special relativity. 3. **Analogy with Quantum Tunneling Effect**: - The paper draws an analogy between the results of the OPERA experiment and the quantum tunneling effect, pointing out that the superluminal phenomenon observed during tunneling can be explained by the pulse peak speed, which is not equivalent to the signal propagation speed. 4. **Impact of Absorption and Post-Selection**: - The paper discusses the phenomenon of neutrinos being partially absorbed by the rock during their journey from CERN to LNGS and suggests that post-selection (considering only the neutrinos that were not absorbed) might affect the experimental results. The paper proposes a semi-empirical formula to describe the dwell time in the rock and finds that it roughly matches the results of the OPERA experiment. 5. **Revised Concept of Speed**: - The paper introduces the concept of "post-selection corrected speed," which takes into account the probability of particles being selected for measurement. Even if the pulse peak speed is superluminal, the corrected average speed remains subluminal. Through these analyses, the paper attempts to provide a reasonable explanation for the OPERA experiment results, avoiding major adjustments to the existing theoretical framework of physics.