Abstract:As a schematic model of the complexity economic agents are confronted with, we introduce the "Sherrington-Kirkpatrick game," a discrete time binary choice model inspired from mean-field spin glasses. We show that, even in a completely static environment, agents are unable to learn collectively optimal strategies. This is either because the learning process gets trapped in a suboptimal fixed point or because learning never converges and leads to a never-ending evolution of agent intentions. Contrarily to the hope that learning might save the standard "rational expectation" framework in economics, we argue that complex situations are generically unlearnable and agents must do with satisficing solutions, as argued long ago by Simon [ Q. J. Econ. 69 , 99 (1955)]. Only a centralized, omniscient agent endowed with enormous computing power could qualify to determine the optimal strategy of all agents. Using a mix of analytical arguments and numerical simulations, we find that (i) long memory of past rewards is beneficial to learning, whereas overreaction to recent past is detrimental and leads to cycles or chaos; (ii) increased competition (nonreciprocity) destabilizes fixed points and leads first to chaos and, in the high competition limit, to quasicycles; (iii) some amount of randomness in the learning process, perhaps paradoxically, allows the system to reach better collective decisions; (iv) nonstationary, "aging" behavior spontaneously emerges in a large swath of parameter space of our complex but static world. On the positive side, we find that the learning process allows cooperative systems to coordinate around satisficing solutions with rather high (but markedly suboptimal) average reward. However, hypersensitivity to the game parameters makes it impossible to predict ex ante who will be better or worse off in our stylized economy. The statistical description of the space of satisficing solutions is an open problem. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021039 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society

Reputation, learning and project choice in frictional economies

Reputation preferences resolve social dilemmas in spatial multigames

Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks.

Reputation in the Presence of Noisy Exogenous Learning

Reputation and Pricing Dynamics in Online Markets

Market selection with learning and catching up with the Joneses

A Maximum Entropy Model of Bounded Rational Decision-Making with Prior Beliefs and Market Feedback

Learning, belief manipulation and optimal relationship termination

Learning Fair Cooperation in Mixed-Motive Games with Indirect Reciprocity

Non-strategic Econometrics (for Initial Play)

Dynamic Models of Appraisal Networks Explaining Collective Learning

Cooperation and Reputation Dynamics with Reinforcement Learning

Make it 'til you fake it

Many learning agents interacting with an agent-based market model

Acquisition of Project-Specific Assets with Bayesian Updating

Operant matching as a Nash equilibrium of an intertemporal game

Unlearnable Games and "Satisficing" Decisions: A Simple Model for a Complex World

A Dynamic Framework of Reputation Systems for an Agent Mediated e-market

REPUTATION, UTILITY AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION STRATEGIES

Modeling reputation-based behavioral biases in school choice

An evolutionary game with reputation-based imitation-mutation dynamics