Modeling reputation-based behavioral biases in school choice

Jon Kleinberg,Sigal Oren,Emily Ryu,Éva Tardos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.04616

2024-03-07

Computer Science and Game Theory

Abstract:A fundamental component in the theoretical school choice literature is the problem a student faces in deciding which schools to apply to. Recent models have considered a set of schools of different selectiveness and a student who is unsure of their strength and can apply to at most $k$ schools. Such models assume that the student cares solely about maximizing the quality of the school that they attend, but experience suggests that students' decisions are also influenced by a set of behavioral biases based on reputational effects: a subjective reputational benefit when admitted to a selective school, whether or not they attend; and a subjective loss based on disappointment when rejected. Guided by these observations, and inspired by recent behavioral economics work on loss aversion relative to expectations, we propose a behavioral model by which a student chooses schools to balance these behavioral effects with the quality of the school they attend. Our main results show that a student's choices change in dramatic ways when these reputation-based behavioral biases are taken into account. In particular, where a rational applicant spreads their applications evenly, a biased student applies very sparsely to highly selective schools, such that above a certain threshold they apply to only an absolute constant number of schools even as their budget of applications grows to infinity. Consequently, a biased student underperforms a rational student even when the rational student is restricted to a sufficiently large upper bound on applications and the biased student can apply to arbitrarily many. Our analysis shows that the reputation-based model is rich enough to cover a range of different ways that biased students cope with fear of rejection, including not just targeting less selective schools, but also occasionally applying to schools that are too selective, compared to rational students.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of how behavioral biases in students' application processes affect their decision-making during school selection. Specifically, the paper explores how students, when applying to schools, not only consider the quality of the schools but are also influenced by reputation-based behavioral biases, such as the subjective reputation gains from being admitted to highly selective schools and the subjective losses from being rejected. These behavioral biases lead to application strategies that significantly differ from those predicted by rational models. Particularly, when facing highly selective schools, students apply very sparsely, even if they could apply to more schools. By establishing a model that incorporates behavioral effects, the paper examines the impact of these biases on students' final admission outcomes. It finds that students with behavioral biases may have lower expected admission results even if they can apply to an unlimited number of schools, compared to rational students applying to a limited number of schools. Additionally, the paper discusses how students with behavioral biases respond to rejections under different parameters, including overly concentrating on applying to less selective schools or occasionally applying to overly selective schools.