Variety of femoral anteversion and its measurement in cementless total hip arthroplasty: Does robotic technology improve accuracy?

Hongyi Shao,Yong Huang,Dejin Yang,Wang Deng,Xiang-Dong Wu,Yixin Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04527-z
IF: 2.6
2024-01-11
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Abstract:High-performance total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on the accurate position of components. However, femoral anteversion is variable, and current studies only used traditional instruments to evaluate it, such as protractor and spirit level with limited cases. This study aimed to identify the variability in the measured femoral native anteversion and intraoperative stem anteversion under different measurement methods, including intraoperative robotic method. We hypothesized that robotic technology was more accurate than traditional instruments for femoral anteversion evaluation.
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the measurement methods and their accuracy of femoral anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Specifically, the study aims to identify the changes in native femoral anteversion and intraoperative stem anteversion under different measurement methods, especially to compare the accuracy of robotic technology and traditional tools in evaluating femoral anteversion. The research hypothesis is that robotic technology is more accurate than traditional tools in evaluating femoral anteversion. The paper retrospectively analyzed the data of 117 patients who underwent robot - assisted THA surgery from November 2019 to March 2021. It compared the native femoral anteversion measured by the robot system before surgery with the stem anteversion measured by visual inspection, protractor and robot system during surgery respectively, and finally used the stem anteversion measured by postoperative CT scan as the "gold standard" to verify the accuracy of various methods. The study found that the native femoral anteversion measured by the robot before surgery varied greatly, while the stem anteversion measured by the robot during surgery was more consistent and highly correlated with the postoperative CT measurement results, indicating that robotic technology indeed has higher accuracy and reliability in evaluating femoral anteversion.