Abstract:The flash flood-induced erosion is the primary contributor to soil loss within the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR). This phenomenon is exacerbated by a confluence of factors, including extreme precipitation events, undulating topographical features, and suboptimal soil and water conservation practices. Over the past few decades, several flash flood events have led to the significant degradation of pedosphere strata, which in turn has caused landslides along with fluvial sedimentation in the IHR. Researchers have advocated morphometric, hydrologic, and semi-empirical methods for assessing flash flood-induced soil erosion in hilly watersheds. This study critically examines these methods and their applicability in the Alaknanda River basin of the Indian Himalayan Region. The entire basin is delineated into 12 sub-watersheds, and 13 morphometric parameters are analyzed for each sub-watershed. Thereafter, the ranking of sub-watersheds vulnerability is assigned using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA), compounding method (CM), Geomorphological Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH), and Revised Universal Soil Loss Equations (RUSLE) approaches. While the CM method uses all 13 parameters, the PCA approach suggests that the first four principal components are the most important ones, accounting for approximately 89.7% of the total variance observed within the dataset. The GIUH approach highlights the hydrological response of the catchment, incorporating dynamic velocity and instantaneous peak magnifying the flash flood susceptibility, lag time, and the time to peak for each sub-watershed. The RUSLE approach incorporates mathematical equations for estimating annual soil loss utilizing rainfall-runoff erosivity, soil erodibility, topographic, cover management, and supporting practice factors. The variations in vulnerability rankings across various methods indicate that each method captures distinct aspects of the sub-watersheds. The decision-maker can use the weighted average to assign the overall vulnerability to each sub-watershed, aggregating the values from various methods. This study considers an equal weight to the morphometric, hydrological GIUH, and semi-empirical RUSLE techniques to assess the integrated ranking of various sub-watersheds. Vulnerability to flash flood-induced landslides in various sub-watersheds is categorized into three classes. Category I (high-priority) necessitates immediate erosion control measures and slope stabilization. Category II (moderate attention), where rainwater harvesting and sustainable agricultural practices are beneficial. Category III (regular monitoring) suggests periodic community-led soil assessments and afforestation. Sub-watersheds WS11, WS8, WS5, and WS12 are identified under category I, WS7, WS4, WS9, and WS6 under category II, and WS1, WS3, WS2, and WS10 under category III. The occurrence of landslides and flash-flood events and field observations validates the prioritization of sub-watersheds, indicating the need for targeted interventions and regular monitoring activities to mitigate environmental risks and safeguard surrounding ecosystems and communities.

Prioritization of Susceptibility Zones for Multi-Hazard in Jammu Division of the North-West Himalayas, India for Disaster Risk Reduction

Assessing Multi-hazard risk for disaster risk reduction in Jammu Division in North–West Himalayas, India

Multi-Hazard Susceptibility Assessment Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Frequency Ratio Techniques in the Northwest Himalayas, Pakistan

Multi-hazard susceptibility mapping of landslides and earthquakes in Bhagirathi Valley region of Uttarakhand Himalaya, India

Examining social vulnerability to multi‐hazards in North‐Western Himalayas, India

Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal

Assessing and Mapping Spatial Variation Characteristics of Natural Hazards in Pakistan

Multi-hazard susceptibility and exposure assessment of the Hindu Kush Himalaya

Landslide hazard zonation using analytical hierarchy process along National Highway-3 in mid Himalayas of Himachal Pradesh, India

A Review of Spatial Variations of Multiple Natural Hazards and Risk Management Strategies in Pakistan

Landslide susceptibility assessment of Kashmir Himalaya, India

Snow avalanche susceptibility along Mughal Road, North-western Himalaya using geospatial techniques

A Multicriteria Approach for Landslide Hazard Zonation in the Lesser Kumaun Himalaya

Delineation of Multi hazards vulnerable zone using the Geospatial approach: A micro-region level study in Indian Coastal Sundarban

Evaluating landslide hazard, vulnerability, and risk using machine learning; A case study from the Alaknanda Valley, NW Himalaya

A Geographical approach of watershed prioritization in the Himalayas: a case study in the middle mountain district of Nepal

Hybrid Spatial Modelling on Urban Flood Hazard Using Remote Sensing, GIS, and Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Study of Delhi NCR, India

Integrating Geoenvironmental and Socioenvironmental Analyses for Flood Vulnerability Assessment in the Kullu Valley, Himachal Pradesh, India

GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation mapping using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method in parts of Kalimpong Region of Darjeeling Himalaya

A comparative study of morphometric, hydrologic, and semi-empirical methods for the prioritization of sub-watersheds against flash flood-induced landslides in a part of the Indian Himalayan Region

Integrated Spatial Analysis of Forest Fire Susceptibility in the Indian Western Himalayas (IWH) Using Remote Sensing and GIS-Based Fuzzy AHP Approach