Abstract:The flash flood-induced erosion is the primary contributor to soil loss within the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR). This phenomenon is exacerbated by a confluence of factors, including extreme precipitation events, undulating topographical features, and suboptimal soil and water conservation practices. Over the past few decades, several flash flood events have led to the significant degradation of pedosphere strata, which in turn has caused landslides along with fluvial sedimentation in the IHR. Researchers have advocated morphometric, hydrologic, and semi-empirical methods for assessing flash flood-induced soil erosion in hilly watersheds. This study critically examines these methods and their applicability in the Alaknanda River basin of the Indian Himalayan Region. The entire basin is delineated into 12 sub-watersheds, and 13 morphometric parameters are analyzed for each sub-watershed. Thereafter, the ranking of sub-watersheds vulnerability is assigned using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA), compounding method (CM), Geomorphological Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH), and Revised Universal Soil Loss Equations (RUSLE) approaches. While the CM method uses all 13 parameters, the PCA approach suggests that the first four principal components are the most important ones, accounting for approximately 89.7% of the total variance observed within the dataset. The GIUH approach highlights the hydrological response of the catchment, incorporating dynamic velocity and instantaneous peak magnifying the flash flood susceptibility, lag time, and the time to peak for each sub-watershed. The RUSLE approach incorporates mathematical equations for estimating annual soil loss utilizing rainfall-runoff erosivity, soil erodibility, topographic, cover management, and supporting practice factors. The variations in vulnerability rankings across various methods indicate that each method captures distinct aspects of the sub-watersheds. The decision-maker can use the weighted average to assign the overall vulnerability to each sub-watershed, aggregating the values from various methods. This study considers an equal weight to the morphometric, hydrological GIUH, and semi-empirical RUSLE techniques to assess the integrated ranking of various sub-watersheds. Vulnerability to flash flood-induced landslides in various sub-watersheds is categorized into three classes. Category I (high-priority) necessitates immediate erosion control measures and slope stabilization. Category II (moderate attention), where rainwater harvesting and sustainable agricultural practices are beneficial. Category III (regular monitoring) suggests periodic community-led soil assessments and afforestation. Sub-watersheds WS11, WS8, WS5, and WS12 are identified under category I, WS7, WS4, WS9, and WS6 under category II, and WS1, WS3, WS2, and WS10 under category III. The occurrence of landslides and flash-flood events and field observations validates the prioritization of sub-watersheds, indicating the need for targeted interventions and regular monitoring activities to mitigate environmental risks and safeguard surrounding ecosystems and communities.

Integrating Geoenvironmental and Socioenvironmental Analyses for Flood Vulnerability Assessment in the Kullu Valley, Himachal Pradesh, India

Ecological Challenges and Vulnerability Assessment for Exploring the Adaptation-Development Nexus for Sustainability in Alaknanda River Basin, Uttarakhand, India

Climate change induced disasters and highly vulnerable infrastructure in Uttarakhand, India: current status and way forward towards resilience and long-term sustainability

Assessing the influence of watershed characteristics on the flood vulnerability of Jhelum basin in Kashmir Himalaya

Climate change-derived environmental and physical factors influencing the socioeconomic development in the Himalayan region

Flood Susceptibility and Risk Mapping of Kathmandu Valley Watershed, Nepal

Integrated flood risk assessment in Hunza-Nagar, Pakistan: unifying big climate data analytics and multi-criteria decision-making with GIS

Spatial assessment of flood vulnerability and waterlogging extent in agricultural lands using RS-GIS and AHP technique—a case study of Patan district Gujarat, India

Integrated approach for spatial flood susceptibility assessment in Bhagirathi sub‐basin, India using entropy information theory and geospatial technology

India's flood risk assessment and mapping with multi-criteria decision analysis and GIS integration

A comparative study of morphometric, hydrologic, and semi-empirical methods for the prioritization of sub-watersheds against flash flood-induced landslides in a part of the Indian Himalayan Region

Multi-hazard susceptibility mapping of landslides and earthquakes in Bhagirathi Valley region of Uttarakhand Himalaya, India

Futuristic Flood Risks Assessment, in the Upper Vellar Basin, Integrating AHP and Bivariate Analysis

A Model-Based Flood Hazard Mapping on the Southern Slope of Himalaya

Geospatial AI solution to monitor and mitigate increasing adverse ecological and hydrological impacts of climate change in Uttarakhand Himalaya (India)

Large-Scale Flood Hazard Monitoring and Impact Assessment on Landscape: Representative Case Study in India

An effective geospatial-based flash flood susceptibility assessment with hydrogeomorphic responses on groundwater recharge

Geospatial technology-based monitoring of HAGL in the context of flash flood: A case study of Rishi Ganga Basin, India

Comprehensive assessment of flood exposure in arid regions: Integrating GIS techniques and multi-method approaches – A case study of downstream swat river, Pakistan

Soil Erosion Risk and Flood Behaviour Assessment of Sukhnag catchment, Kashmir Basin: Using GIS and Remote Sensing

Glacial lake outburst flood risk assessment using remote sensing and hydrodynamic modeling: a case study of Satluj basin, Western Himalayas, India