Abstract:Over the past three decades, the U.S. judiciary has grown increasingly less receptive to claims by convicted felons as to the conditions of their confinement while in prison. Although courts have not articulated a return to the "hands off" policy of the 1950s, it is clear that it has become significantly more difficult for prisoners to prevail in constitutional correctional litigation. The passage and aggressive implementation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act has been a powerful disincentive to such litigation in many areas of prisoners' rights law. From the perspective of the prisoner, the legal landscape is more hopeful in matters that relate to mental health care and treatment. Here, in spite of a general trend toward more stringent applications of standards of proof and a reluctance to order sweeping, intrusive remedies, some courts have aggressively protected prisoners' rights to be free from "deliberate indifference" to serious medical needs, and to be free from excessive force on the part of prison officials. A mostly hidden undercurrent in some prisoners' rights litigation has been the effort on the part of some plaintiffs' lawyers to look to international human rights doctrines as a potential source of rights, an effort that has met with some modest success. It receives support by the inclination of other courts to turn to international human rights conventions-even in nations where such conventions have not been ratified-as a kind of "best practice" in the area. The recent publication and subsequent ratification (though not, as of yet, by the United States) of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) may add new support to those using international human rights documents as a basis for litigating prisoners' rights claims. To the best of our knowledge, there has, as of yet, been no scholarly literature on the question of the implications of the CRPD on the state of prisoners' rights law in a U.S. domestic context. In this article, we raise this question, and offer some tentative conclusions.

International Human Rights Law: Enforcement Mechanisms and Challenges in a Globalized World

The Law of International Human Rights Protection

Enforcers beyond Borders: Transnational NGOs and the Enforcement of International Law

Review of 'Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics' by Beth A. Simmons

Global Legal Contexts for the Protection of Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

Human Rights Dilemma and International Rule of Law in the Age of Digital Intelligence

Protection of labor rights of employees of international intergovernmental organizations: theory and practice

Refugee Rights and International Law: Evaluating the Efficacy of Global Humanitarian Responses to Forced Displacement

Increasing compliance with international pandemic law: international relations and new global health agreements

Into The Void: International Law And The Protection Of Animal Welfare

Fifty Years of Human Rights Enforcement in Legal and Political Systems in Bangladesh: Past Controversies and Future Challenges

International Human Rights Law and the Protection of Refugees in the Modern World

Implementation of Legal Guarantees for Human Rights Protection in Indonesia

Teaching and Research of International Humanitarian Law in Asia: Efforts, Issues and Prospects

The Interaction of International Human Rights Law with the Domestic Jurisdictions. Present Problems

Digital Rights and the Outer Limits of International Human Rights Law

Protection of Human Rights Against the Environment in the Indonesian Legal System

Problems of Interaction Between the International and Domestic Legal Orders

The power of human rights tribunals: Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and domestic policy change

Protection of Natural Environment and Cultural Property during Armed Conflict: An International Humanitarian Law Perspective