Global Legal Contexts for the Protection of Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis

Alok Kumar Yadav,Anil Kumar Singh,Indravesh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.1179
2023-09-11
Journal of Law and Sustainable Development
Abstract:Objective: Human rights protection in today's globalized world necessitates familiarity with a wide range of legal systems. Human rights protection laws all throughout the world are compared and contrasted in this research. While human rights apply to every nation, they are complicated and are often codified in diverse ways. The research presented here emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of these distinctions to ensure the survival of human rights and nature rights, human dignity, and justice. There are several obstacles to overcome when negotiating these legal terrains. Challenges arise from factors including divergent meanings, incomplete plans, cultural differences, and the ever-changing digital landscape. Method: The present research proposes a Synthesized Cultural Legal Frameworks (SCLF) for Universal Human Rights Protection as a means to provide universal human rights protection. This method is an attempt to recognize cultural differences while still achieving a worldwide approach to protecting human rights through a harmonized interpretation of the law. Result: This research has implications for policymakers, diplomats, lawyers, and activist organizations. This in-depth examination aids in gaining a better understanding of the intricate worldwide legal framework underlying environment and human rights. Conclusion: The research makes projections about the future of international collaboration, the success of legal harmonization initiatives, and global human rights results by modelling hypothetical situations based on possible legal harmonization efforts. Strategic planning and well-considered decision-making benefit from this dynamic method. The simulation analysis is based on the societal and economic effects and the efforts to harmonize the law.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?