Abstract:Michel Agier’s Managing the Undesirables is one of several texts that addresses the complex and proliferating humanitarian infrastructure that is increasingly prevalent in regions of the world besieged by violence and displacement, but his work stands out as particularly important and innovative. Agier addresses some of the central questions facing our world today: belonging, personhood, and the ability of those most cut off from political power to speak for themselves and shape their own lives, and he does so in a way that combines passion and keen observation. In doing so, his work should be of interest to a broad range of sociologists who study social inequality and the structures (even those built from the best of intentions) that perpetuate it. In this volume, Agier explores the concept of humanitarian government, the political apparatus set up during emergency situations that takes responsibility for the life and death of individuals no longer protected adequately by a state. For as Agier shows, a refugee camp is far more than a place of shelters and emergency food aid. They are places in which someone decides who gets plastic sheeting and who does not, who receives food rations and for how long, what social programs should be put into place and who should be in charge of them, and what barriers need to be constructed (barbed wired, armed guards, cinderblock walls) to ostensibly protect those inside but also to protect the local population from incursions of these displaced ‘‘undesirables.’’ Further, these ‘‘camps’’ are hardly temporary shelters; many have existed for decades, taking on the appearance of towns and cities with entrepreneurs setting up small businesses and political elites emerging from the post-flight chaos. And yet, the camp is a hybrid social form, taking the shape of something entirely new from what existed before in the lives of its inhabitants, and as Agier convincingly argues, it exists in a state of exception, outside the bounds of the political and social life that humanitarian law and human rights ostensibly guarantee. Agier uses his ethnologist’s eye for culture to analyze observations he made during fieldwork in refugee camps in Kenya, Zambia, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea between 2000-2007, accessing the camps through Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF; in English, Doctors Without Borders). His affiliation with MSF gave him a level of flexibility and independence (particularly from the United Nations High Commission for Refugees) that allowed him sufficient time in the camps to not only observe humanitarian government at work but also the response of the refugees under its purview. He combines his observations with detailed histories of different migrations, explaining the historical and geographic paths that led different groups of refugees to the camps that he studied. Agier demonstrates the discursive power that humanitarian organizations have over defining and categorizing the displaced individuals in the camps; defining a person’s status as a refugee leads to acceptance into the camp and the security that brings, but the denial of such status leads to rejection and often deportation back to life-threatening circumstances. Once determined as a refugee, a person’s suffering and vulnerability come to define their place in the camp and the world, with moral hierarchies created around different definitions of vulnerability with different access to resources provided by the humanitarian organization. This process, Agier argues, de-socializes refugees; they lose their individual personhood and either become ahistorical, pitiable masses that the charitable-at-heart seek to keep alive, or potential threats to order and the safety of the non-displaced that must be managed or

Refugee Rights and International Law: Evaluating the Efficacy of Global Humanitarian Responses to Forced Displacement

PROTECTION OF CHILD REFUGEES UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

International Human Rights Law and the Protection of Refugees in the Modern World

No Choice but Welcoming Refugees: The Non-Refoulement Principle as Customary International Law in Indonesia

In Search of Durable Solutions for Refugees in Indonesia: A State Security and Human Rights Protection Approach

CONDITIONS, PROBLEMS, AND SOLUTIONS OF ASSOCIATES AND INTERNATIONAL REFUGEES IN INDONESIA IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF NATIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW

Legal Protection of Refugee Rights: Challenges and Solutions

HANDLING OF REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS AT IMMIGRATION DETENTION HOUSES IN INDONESIA BASED ON INTERNATIONAL REFUGE LAW PROVISIONS

Market Threads: How Cotton Farmers and Traders Create A Global Commodity

Refugees in the Global North: dynamics, dilemmas, and constructive engagement

Juridical argumentation in limiting the non-refoulement principle for refugees: A study of immigration policy and Indonesian state sovereignty

International Refugee Law Study Perspective State Obligations to Refugees

Protection of Refugee Women and Girls from Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Under International Law

International experience in determining migrant/ refugee status

Protection of Legal and Human Rights for Uncitizenship Transit Refugees Under International Law and National Law (Rohingnya Refugee Case Study)

The aporia of refugee rights in a time of crises: the role of brokers in accessing refugee protection in transit and at the border

Globalization and Climate Refugees Exposing the Protection Gap in International Law

Legal aspects of conflict-induced migration by women

Constitutionalizing Protection for Refugee Women and Girls in South Asia

Hierarchical Governance and the Refugee Compact in Central America: Host States, Containment, and the Absence of International Resettlement

The Right to Health And Barriers to Health Services for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons: Review of Foreign Literature