Abstract:The article brings to the attention of the scientific community some results of a study of current problems of legal regulation of relations arising in connection with the operation of highly automated vehicles, voiced by the authors as part of a plenary report and speeches at the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference “Tambov Legal Readings named after F.N. Plevako” (Tambov, 19th–20th of May, 2023). The rapid development of the highly automated car industry gives rise to a whole range of problematic issues, the totality of which can be characterized as a challenge for Russian tort law. A special place among such issues is occupied by the problem of liability of manufacturers of highly automated cars for damage caused by cars equipped with automatic driving systems. An analysis of scientific sources shows that these issues have not received the necessary and sufficient coverage in Russian literature to resolve problematic situations that arise during the operation of highly automated vehicles. Due to the authors’ awareness of this problem, which consists in the contradiction between the needs of law enforcement practice and the lack of a consistent and problem-free system of legal regulation based on scientific study, this article attempts to provide an analysis of one of the key problems that are important when considering cases of attracting manufacturers to no-fault liability for causing harm by a highly automated car, namely the problem of determining the defect of the car. Using a traditional set of legal research methods (formal-dogmatic, systemic and comparative legal), existing approaches to determining the disadvantage of a car as a product are analyzed. Based on the results of the analysis, the conclusion is substantiated that the current gap in the legislation on technical regulation gives rise to significant difficulties in practically resolving the issue of the presence or absence of a deficiency in a highly automated vehicle. In order to solve this problem, a qualitative criterion has been formulated to identify the shortcomings of a highly automated car, which can be legalized in the legislation on technical regulation and used in judicial practice.

Consumer Protection Against Defects in Automated Vehicles

Automated Driving: Liability of the Software Producer and the Producer of the Automated Vehicle

Automated Driving and Product Liability

Autonomous and Automated Vehicles in Germany and Hungary, with Special Attention to the Question of Civil Liability

Strafrechtliche Produktverantwortung für automatisiertes und autonomes Fahren

Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis

The Awkward Middle for Automated Vehicles: Liability Attribution Rules When Humans and Computers Share Driving Responsibilities

Grounding the case for a European approach to the regulation of automated driving: the technology-selection effect of liability rules

CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF SELF-DRIVING VEHICLES UNDER HUNGARIAN CRIMINAL LAW

Research on tort liability of autonomous vehicle

Product liability for defective AI

Reflections on Civil Liability and Autonomous Vehicles

Issues of improving Russian legislation on technical regulation in terms of determining the shortcomings of a highly automated car

Economic Rationality and Ethical Values in Design-Defect Analysis: The Trolley Problem and Autonomous Vehicles

Connected Automated Driving: Civil Liability Regulation in the European Union

Approaches to Autonomous Driving Vehicle Traffic Accidents Liability in China

Negligence Failures And Negligence Fixes. A Comparative Analysis Of Criminal Regulation Of AI And Autonomous Vehicles

Autonomous Cars and Tort Liability

The Twofold Role of Legal Liability Misattribution on Intention to Buy Automated Vehicles: A Survey in China

Who is to blame for crashes involving autonomous vehicles? Exploring blame attribution across the road transport system

Liability for Autonomous Vehicles and Legal Maintenance of Traffic Laws: Focusing on a New Automated Vehicles Act in the UK