Abstract:Human agency has become increasingly limited in complex systems with increasingly automated decision-making capabilities. For instance, human occupants are passengers and do not have direct vehicle control in fully automated cars (i.e., driverless cars). An interesting question is whether users are responsible for the accidents of these cars. Normative ethical and legal analyses frequently argue that individuals should not bear responsibility for harm beyond their control. Here, we consider human judgment of responsibility for accidents involving fully automated vehicles through three studies with seven experiments ( N = 2668). We compared the responsibility attributed to the occupants in three conditions: an owner in his private fully automated car, a passenger in a driverless robotaxi, and a passenger in a conventional taxi, where none of these three occupants have direct vehicle control over the involved vehicles that cause identical pedestrian injury. In contrast to normative analyses, we show that the occupants of driverless cars (private cars and robotaxis) are attributed more responsibility than conventional taxi passengers. This dilemma is robust across different contexts (e.g., participants from China vs the Republic of Korea, participants with first- vs third-person perspectives, and occupant presence vs absence). Furthermore, we observe that this is not due to the perception that these occupants have greater control over driving but because they are more expected to foresee the potential consequences of using driverless cars involving counterfactual thinking. Our findings suggest that when driverless vehicles (private cars and taxis) cause harm, their users may face more social pressure, which public discourse and legal regulations should manage appropriately.

Strafrechtliche Produktverantwortung für automatisiertes und autonomes Fahren

Automated Driving: Liability of the Software Producer and the Producer of the Automated Vehicle

Consumer Protection Against Defects in Automated Vehicles

Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis

Automated Driving and Product Liability

Legal aspects of autonomous driving

Autonomous and Automated Vehicles in Germany and Hungary, with Special Attention to the Question of Civil Liability

Research on tort liability of autonomous vehicle

Who is to blame for crashes involving autonomous vehicles? Exploring blame attribution across the road transport system

The German Act on Autonomous Driving: Why Ethics Still Matters

Autonomous vehicles and moral judgments under risk

Societal and Individual Acceptance of Autonomous Driving

The Self-Driving Car: Crossroads at the Bleeding Edge of Artificial Intelligence and Law

Impact of Partially Automated Driving Functions on Forensic Accident Reconstruction: A Simulator Study on Driver Reaction Behavior in the Event of a Malfunctioning System Behavior

Autonomous Cars and Tort Liability

Not in Control, but Liable? Attributing Human Responsibility for Fully Automated Vehicle Accidents

On the Legal and Economic Implications of Tele-Driving

The Awkward Middle for Automated Vehicles: Liability Attribution Rules When Humans and Computers Share Driving Responsibilities

The risk ethics of autonomous vehicles: an empirical approach

Plenty of blame to go around: Attributions of responsibility in a fatal autonomous vehicle accident

Automated driving for car manufacturers’ vehicle logistics