Abstract:Autonomous driving technology, as another major revolution in the field of transportation technology, brings new challenges to the provisions of the current legal system. Whether the autonomous vehicle can become the subject responsible for traffic accidents, whether the manufacturer of autonomous vehicle should bear the responsibility, and how to identify the drivers responsibility have become difficult problems in the process of responsibility identification. To solve the above issues, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of US and UK autonomous vehicle regulations, incorporating Chinas existing traffic laws, to propose a classification standard for autonomous vehicle traffic accident liability in the Chinese context. This research proposed framework hinges on two principles. Firstly, it differentiates between driving assistance and full autonomous driving, applying existing traffic accident tort liability rules during driving assistance, with manufacturer liability for technology failures. In contrast, autonomous driving warrants manufacturer product liability. Secondly, framework distinguishes between human and autonomous driving, determining liability based on the vehicles operating mode at the time of an accident. Users are liable if they didnt engage autonomous mode or intervened, while accidents in full autonomous mode invoke manufacturer product liability. Recognizing flaws in the product liability system, such as delayed compensation and high litigation costs, we propose introducing a liability insurance system. This multifaceted approach safeguards victims and mitigates risks in the evolving autonomous driving landscape.

Liability design for autonomous vehicles and human-driven vehicles: A hierarchical game-theoretic approach

Legal Framework for Rear-End Crashes in Mixed-Traffic Platooning: A Matrix Game Approach

Autonomous vehicles policy and safety investment: An equilibrium analysis with endogenous demand

Autonomous Vehicles: Moral dilemmas and adoption incentives

Human-Like Decision Making for Autonomous Driving: A Noncooperative Game Theoretic Approach

Safe, Efficient and Socially-Compatible Decision of Automated Vehicles: a Case Study of Unsignalized Intersection Driving

A Multi-Vehicle Game-Theoretic Framework for Decision Making and Planning of Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic

Game-based Decision Algorithm for Socially Compatible Automated Driving: a Case Study of Unsignalized Intersection Driving

Approaches to Autonomous Driving Vehicle Traffic Accidents Liability in China

Three Principles to Determine the Right-of-Way for AVs: Safe Interaction With Humans

Moral Dilemma Facing Autonomous Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Model

Enhancing Social Decision-Making of Autonomous Vehicles: A Mixed-Strategy Game Approach With Interaction Orientation Identification

Game-Theoretic Adversarial Interaction-Based Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Vehicles

Driving Conflict Resolution of Autonomous Vehicles at Unsignalized Intersections: A Differential Game Approach

The Twofold Role of Legal Liability Misattribution on Intention to Buy Automated Vehicles: A Survey in China

Negligence Failures And Negligence Fixes. A Comparative Analysis Of Criminal Regulation Of AI And Autonomous Vehicles

Cooperative Decision Making of Lane-change for Automated Vehicles Considering Human-like Driving Characteristics

Adaptive Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles: A Learning-Enhanced Game-Theoretic Approach in Interactive Environments

Interactive strategy of shared control vehicle and automated vehicles based on adaptive non-cooperative game

Human-centered Driving Authority Allocation for Driver-Automation Shared Control: A Two-Layer Game-Theoretic Approach

Noncooperative-Game-Based Intelligent Vehicle Decision Method for Lane-Changing Interactive Behavior