Abstract:Abstract Principles form part and parcel of our law and legal discourse, so much so that we seldom think of what they are and what they entail. For centuries they have been invoked daily to interpret and argue about the law. But when it comes to matters of constitutional law, principles are further called upon to perform a perennially controversial function: to help police the boundaries of state action. In most common law jurisdictions with a written constitution, this function of principles runs against the generally accepted view that the exercise of judicial review must ultimately be governed and restricted by the terms of the national constitution. This Article argues that the exercise of judicial review based on principles is not confined to that view, once the relationship between principles and the constitution is unpacked and recontextualized. While the English-language literature on principles over the past half-century has been dominated by a select group of Anglo-American scholars, there is a wealth of untapped insights from other parts of the world. One of the major contributions by continental legal theorists even predates the earliest modern Anglo-American writings on the subject by more than a decade. Overall, the law literature in common law and civil law systems reveals a significant degree of commonalities in the basic characters of principles despite the absence of initial evidence of transsystemic borrowings. The wider conceptual inquiry also displays a shift in the focus of the debate, from the protracted search for a clear-cut distinction between rules and principles towards a redefinition of principles’ relationship with “written” law, be it in the form of a civil code or a constitutional instrument. From this inquiry reemerge “unwritten” principles not deriving from codified or legislated law although they have been used to develop the law. Translated into the constitutional domain, these unwritten principles bear no logical connection with the terms of the constitution. Their main functions cover the entire spectrum from serving as interpretive aids to making law by filling gaps. The theoretical framework fits with an ongoing four-century-old narrative of the evolution of constitutional principles and judicial review across most common law-based systems. Constitutional principles are another area where Anglo-American law and legal discourse is less exceptional and more universal than what many assume. Throughout modern Western history, legal battles have been fought and ensuing developments have been made on the grounds of principles. Our law and jurisprudence remain based on them.

Principles of Civil Procedure Law: Preserving the Foundations

The Improvement of Scientific Approaches to Bases for Classification of Civil Procedure Law Principles

An Analysis of Civil Procedure Principles from the Standpoint of the System Theory

Principles of Civil Procedure Law in the Conditions of Deritualization and Dematerialization of Justice

Principles of legal proceedings in the Code of administrative proceedings and in the Civil procedure code

Reflections on Issues Concerning the Basic Principles of the Civil Procedural Law

Theoretical and legal characteristics of the civil law principles

FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN PREVENTING PROTRACTED LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On the Role of Some Civil Procedure Principles in Limitation of Opportunities for Abuse of Procedural Rights

PASSIVE PROCEDURAL POSITION AND THE PROBLEM OF DISHONESTY OF THE PARTIES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

Principles of Modern Non-Judicial Administrative Process (Administrative Proceedings): Problems of Understanding and Systematization

The main principles of the Soviet civil proceedings and their modern evolution (to the 100th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Code of the RSFSR in 1923)

The concept and meaning of the principles of civil procedural law in martial law

Modern Tendencies of the Development of Civil Procedure Law Principles in the Conditions of Digitization of Procedural Relationships

Legal Principles, Constitutional Principles, and Judicial Review

Implementation of Some Civil Procedure Principles in Review of Sports Disputes

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

Rethinking and Restructuring Non-Litigation Procedure

Frontiers of the Civil Procedural Law Theory

Systematization of property claims in civil law

Criminal procedure ≠ criminal justice