Coronary microvascular dysfunction: prevalence and aetiology in patients with suspected myocardial ischaemia
H. Kong,J. Cao,J. Tian,J. Yong,J. An,L. Zhang,X. Song,Y. He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.01.010
IF: 3.389
2024-01-25
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:Aim To evaluate the prevalence, aetiology, and corresponding morbidity of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in patients with suspected myocardial ischaemia. Materials And Methods The present study included 115 patients with suspected myocardial ischaemia who underwent stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. CMD was assessed visually based on the myocardial perfusion results. The CMR-derived myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) and left ventricular (LV) strain parameters obtained using the post-processing software CVI42 were employed to evaluate LV myocardial perfusion and deformation. LV strain parameters included global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain (GLS, GCS, and GRS), global systolic/diastolic longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain rates (SLSR, SCSR, SRSR, DLSR, DCSR, and DRSR). Results Of the 115 patients, 12 patients were excluded and 103 patients were finally included in the study. CMD was observed in 79% (81 patients, aged 53 ± 12 years) of patients. Regarding aetiology, 91 (88%) patients had non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), eight (8%) had obstructive CAD, and four (4%) had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The incidence of CMD was highest (100%) in patients with HCM, followed by those with non-obstructive CAD (up to 79%). There were no statistical differences between CMD and non-CMD groups in GCS, GRS, GLS, SRSR, SCSR, SLSR, DCSR, DRSR and DLSR. Conclusion The incidence of CMD was higher in patients with signs and symptoms of ischaemia. CMD occurred with non-obstructive CAD, obstructive CAD, and HCM, with the highest prevalence of CMD in HCM.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging