Comment on "Photon-assisted electron transport in graphene: Scattering theory analysis"

M. Ahsan Zeb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1010.2097

2010-10-25

Abstract:It is argued that Trauzettel et al. [Phys. Rev. B 75, 035305 (2007)] made some mistakes in their calculations regarding the photon-assisted transport in graphene that lead to uncoupled sidebands and emergence of step-like features in dG/dV (G is differential conductance and V is the bias voltage). We discuss the relevant corrections and explain in detail how the correct results are expected to be quite different than the incorrect ones.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the computational errors in the research on photon - assisted electron transport in graphene published by Trauzettel et al. in 2007. Specifically, the author M. Ahsan Zeb points out that there are some crucial errors in Trauzettel et al.'s research, resulting in their results being inconsistent with the actual situation.

### Main problems

1. **Sideband decoupling problem**:
Trauzettel et al. assumed in their model that each sideband was independent, which led to incorrect results. In fact, the sidebands are strongly coupled and cannot be simply regarded as an independent DC potential problem. This error has led to significant deviations in the calculation of transmission probability and current.

2. **Wave function error**:
Trauzettel et al. introduced an unnecessary Bessel function \( J_m \left( \frac{eV_{ac}}{\hbar \omega} \right) \) in the expressions of the reflected and transmitted wave functions, and these wave function forms do not conform to the wave equation. The correct wave function should be a linear combination of all sideband energy components and needs to consider the phase factor \( e^{-i \left( \frac{eV_{ac}}{\hbar \omega} \right) \sin(\omega t)} \) caused by the AC signal.

3. **Boundary conditions and transmission probability**:
Due to the above - mentioned wave function errors, the boundary conditions cannot be correctly applied, resulting in the inability to obtain an analytical solution. In addition, Trauzettel et al. ignored some important terms (such as \( \Psi^\dagger_{+,m} \sigma_x \Psi_{+,m'} \)), which affected the expressions of current and differential conductance.

4. **Explanation of step - like features**:
Trauzettel et al. attributed the step - like features in the differential conductance \( \frac{dG}{dV} \) to the disappearance of the density of states at the Dirac point. However, according to the correct theoretical analysis, these step - like features should not appear in the photon - assisted transport problem, because the coupling between sidebands will lead to more complex changes in the total transmission probability when new sidebands appear, rather than simple increases or decreases.

### Summary

The main purpose of this paper is to correct the computational errors in Trauzettel et al.'s photon - assisted transport problem and point out that the correct theoretical framework should consider the strong coupling effect between sidebands. The author emphasizes that the correct results will be significantly different from those shown by Trauzettel et al., especially in the behavior of the differential conductance \( \frac{dG}{dV} \).