Abstract:With an eye on developing a quantum theory of gravity, many physicists have recently searched for quantum challenges to the equivalence principle of general relativity. However, as historians and philosophers of science are well aware, the principle of equivalence is not so clear. When clarified, we think quantum tests of the equivalence principle won't yield much. The problem is that the clash/not-clash is either already evident or guaranteed not to exist. Nonetheless, this work does help teach us what it means for a theory to be geometric.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether quantum mechanics conflicts with the equivalence principle in general relativity and what significance this conflict has for the development of the quantum gravity theory. Specifically:
1. **Core issue**: The paper explores the relationship between quantum mechanics and the equivalence principle, especially whether quantum mechanics violates the equivalence principle and whether this violation is of great significance for understanding quantum gravity.
2. **Background**: The equivalence principle is one of the core principles of general relativity. It states that, locally, a uniform gravitational field and a uniformly accelerated motion are indistinguishable. However, the equivalence principle itself has multiple formulations in different literatures, and there are logical and physical differences among these formulations.
3. **Research motivation**: Since there are significant differences in basic concepts between quantum mechanics and general relativity, researchers hope to find the conflict points between them to promote the development of the quantum gravity theory. In particular, researchers hope to test the equivalence principle through quantum experiments, thereby revealing the relationship between quantum effects and classical gravity.
4. **Main viewpoints**:
- **EP1 (Weak Equivalence Principle)**: The paper points out that quantum mechanics indeed does not satisfy EP1 because the behavior of quantum particles in an external gravitational field is mass - dependent. But this does not mean that the equivalence principle is not valid in general relativity, because EP1 is not strictly valid in general relativity either.
- **EP2 (Einstein Equivalence Principle)**: By analyzing the transformation of the Schrödinger equation in a uniformly accelerated reference frame, the paper proves that quantum mechanics is valid under the Einstein equivalence principle. This means that quantum mechanics does not conflict with EP2.
- **EP3**: The paper proposes an "sufficiently small region" equivalence principle. That is, within a sufficiently small spatial region, the influence of tidal forces can be ignored, so that the equivalence principle is still experimentally valid. But this principle also limits the scale of the quantum system, making it difficult to be used to test quantum effects.
- **EP4**: The paper discusses the concepts of minimal coupling and universality, pointing out that all non - gravitational fields feel the same gravitational field in the same way, and at each space - time point, a coordinate transformation can be found so that the gravitational field variables can be eliminated from the matter field equations. This principle is compatible with quantum mechanics.
5. **Conclusion**: The paper believes that although quantum mechanics conflicts with some forms of the equivalence principle (such as EP1), these conflicts do not substantially help the development of the quantum gravity theory. On the contrary, by clarifying different forms of the equivalence principle, we can better understand the geometric properties of gravity.
In general, this paper aims to clarify the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity by analyzing different forms of the equivalence principle in detail, and points out that the path of looking for quantum challenges to the equivalence principle may not be the key to the quantum gravity theory.