Abstract:Humans routinely make inferences about both the contents and the workings of other minds based on observed actions. People consider what others want or know, but also how intelligent, rational, or attentive they might be. Here, we introduce a new methodology for quantitatively studying the mechanisms people use to attribute intelligence to others based on their behavior. We focus on two key judgments previously proposed in the literature: judgments based on observed outcomes (you're smart if you won the game) and judgments based on evaluating the quality of an agent's planning that led to their outcomes (you're smart if you made the right choice, even if you didn't succeed). We present a novel task, the maze search task (MST), in which participants rate the intelligence of agents searching a maze for a hidden goal. We model outcome-based attributions based on the observed utility of the agent upon achieving a goal, with higher utilities indicating higher intelligence, and model planning-based attributions by measuring the proximity of the observed actions to an ideal planner, such that agents who produce closer approximations of optimal plans are seen as more intelligent. We examine human attributions of intelligence in three experiments that use MST and find that participants used both outcome and planning as indicators of intelligence. However, observing the outcome was not necessary, and participants still made planning-based attributions of intelligence when the outcome was not observed. We also found that the weights individuals placed on plans and on outcome correlated with an individual's ability to engage in cognitive reflection. Our results suggest that people attribute intelligence based on plans given sufficient context and cognitive resources and rely on the outcome when computational resources or context are limited.

Attribution of dispositions to an actor: Effects of perceived decision freedom and behavioral utilities.

Action and Motivation: Measuring Perception or Strategies?

Attribute Latencies Causally Shape Intertemporal Decisions

A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving.

The Avowal of Responsibility for Good and Bad Outcomes

Asymmetrical attributions for approach versus avoidance behavior

Two modes of social impressions and their effects on choice.

Choice confidence bridges credit assignment to levels of decision hierarchy

The role of causal attributions in determining behavioral consequences: A meta-analysis from an intrapersonal attributional perspective in achievement contexts.

Culture and the Attribution Process and Probability Models:An Exploration

More or Less Likeable: The Role of Behavior-Independent Events in the Disposition Formation Process

Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions

The Manipulation: Socio-economic decision making

Determinants of intrinsic motivation: Locus of control and competence information as components of Deci's cognitive evaluation theory.

Mistaking randomness for free will

Effects of Manipulation on Attributions of Causation, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility

Children's motivational perception as related to the instrumentality and effect of action.

Plans or Outcomes: How Do We Attribute Intelligence to Others?

The Fundamental Attribution Error in Human-Robot Interaction: An Experimental Investigation on Attributing Responsibility to a Social Robot for Its Pre-Programmed Behavior

Folk Intuitions About Free Will and Moral Responsibility: Evaluating the Combined Effects of Misunderstandings About Determinism and Motivated Cognition

When (and why) absolute decision attribute values influence human preferences