Abstract:Although intrinsic motivation is often viewed as preferable to more extrinsic forms of motivation, there is evidence that the adaptiveness of these motivational states depends on the nature of the task being completed (e.g., Cerasoli et al., 2014). Specifically, research suggests task-motivation fit such that intrinsic motivation tends to benefit performance on open-ended tasks (tasks that involve qualitative performance assessment; e.g., creative writing) and extrinsic motivation benefits performance on closed-ended tasks (tasks that involve quantitative performance assessment; e.g., multiple choice). We examined people's metamotivational beliefs about intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the context of this task-motivation fit. Across 11 studies (seven primary, four supplemental; N = 3,544), participants provided beliefs about the utility of different types of motivation-regulation strategies: strategies that enhance one's interest and enjoyment in a task versus strategies that focus on the value associated with task outcomes (self-relevance strategies and reward strategies). Across all studies, participants recognized that the adaptiveness of these strategies depends on the nature of the task being completed. Consistent with an understanding of normative task-motivation fit, participants generally reported that interest-enhancing strategies were more useful for open-ended tasks and that reward strategies were more useful for closed-ended tasks; however, in some studies, participants reported that reward strategies were equally useful across task types (Studies 2, 3, and 5). More normatively accurate beliefs were associated with more normatively accurate consequential behavioral choices (Study 6) and better task performance (Study 7). We discuss the implications of these results for theories of motivation and self-regulation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Determinants of intrinsic motivation: Locus of control and competence information as components of Deci's cognitive evaluation theory.

Intrinsic motivation in competition: The intervening role of four individual differences following objective competence information

Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory.

A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.

Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis.

Intrinsic motivation, external reward, and their effect on overall motivation and performance

The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes

Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self‐consciousness, self‐awareness, and ego‐involvement: An investigation of internally controlling styles

The Dark Side of Monetary Incentive

Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated

The undermining effect is a reality after all—Extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination: Reply to Eisenberger, Pierce, and Cameron (1999) and Lepper, Henderlong …

Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again

Dissociable influences of reward and punishment on adaptive cognitive control

Interaction between self-efficacy and initial performance in predicting the complexity of task chosen

Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning

Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory.

Metamotivational beliefs about intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.

Bridging the research traditions of task/ego involvement and intrinsic/extrinsic motivation: Comment on Butler (1987).

The role of causal attributions in determining behavioral consequences: A meta-analysis from an intrapersonal attributional perspective in achievement contexts.

The roles of intrinsic motivation and capability-related factors in cognitive effort-based decision-making