Abstract:Inorganic scintillation detectors are widely used to measure of dose rate in the environment due to their high sensitivity to photon radiation. A distinctive feature when using such detectors is the need to take into account of the position of the effective energy release center. This peculiarity is actual when using measuring instruments with inorganic scintillation detectors as working standards during calibration at short “source – detector” distances in conditions of low-background shield or using a facility with protection from external gamma radiation background in the dose rate range from 0.03 to 0.3 μSv/h (μGy/h). The purpose of this work was to calculate the position of the effective energy release center of NaI(Tl) scintillation detectors and to take it into account when working at short “source – detector” distances. An original method of determining the position of the effective energy release center when irradiating the side and end surfaces of inorganic scintillation detector with parallel gamma radiation flux and point gamma radiation sources at small “source – detector” distances using Monte Carlo methods is proposed. The results of calculations of the position of the effective energy release center of NaI(Tl) based detectors of “popular” sizes for the cases of parallel gamma radiation flux and point sources of gamma radiation at small “source – detector” distances are presented. The functional dependences of the position of the effective energy release center of NaI(Tl) based detectors on the distance to the point gamma radiation sources and the energy of gamma radiation sources are presented. As a result of the study it was found that for scintillation NaI(Tl) detectors of medium size (for example, Ø25×40 mm or Ø40×40 mm) the point gamma radiation source located at a distance of 1 m or more, creates a radiation field which does not differ in characteristics from the radiation field created by a parallel flux of gamma radiation. It is shown that approaching the point gamma radiation source to the surface of scintillation detector leads to displacement of the position of the effective energy release center to the surface of the detector.

Detector efficiency calibration using 88Rb point source

Efficiency and energy resolution of gamma spectrometry system with HPGe detector depending on variable source-to-detector distances

The Efficiency Calibration of Radioxenon Isotopes of Inhomogeneous Adsorption Column for HPGe Γ Spectrometry

Efficiency Calibration of Neutron Detectors with Large Area

Detection Efficiency Calculations Using Geant4 for a Broad-Energy Germanium Gamma Spectrometer

Detection efficiency of a BEGe detector using the Monte Carlo method and a comparison to other calibration methods

Efficiency Calibration of a Large-Area Neutron Detector by Using Am/Be Neutron Source

Characterization and performance of co-axial HPGe detectors

Analysis of the Influence of Spot Diameter of Point Sources on HPGE Detector Γ-Ray Efficiencies Simulation for Volume Source

Design of simulated-gas calibration source and self-attenuation correction methods for radioactive noble gas measurement with HPGe detector

Gamma ray registration efficiency simulation of a HPGe detector with PHITS

A plastic scintillator and HPGe β-γ coincidence detection system

Simplified Efficiency Calibration Methods for Semiconductor Detectors used in Criticality Dosimetry

Radioxenon beta-gamma coincidence efficiency for a SAUNA detector by Geant4 simulation

The Monte Carlo Method for the Detective Efficiency of Radioxenon

Calculation of the Effective Energy Release Centerʼs Position of Inorganic Scintillation Detectors for Calibration at Small “Source–Detector” Distances

Monte-Carlo Calculations of HPGe Detection Efficiency and Coincidence-summing Correction

Spectroscopic performance evaluation and modeling of a low background HPGe detector using GEANT4

Modeling the detection efficiency of an HP-Ge detector for use in boron neutron capture therapy

Characterization of a $^{220}$Rn source for low-energy electronic recoil calibration of the XENONnT detector