Abstract:Objective:To determine the biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.Methods:After nonlinear finite element models of the intact upper cervical spine (C0-3) were constructed and validated, they were processed into 3 kinds with normal axis anatomy, a high-riding vertebral artery and a thin axis lamina, re-spectively.In the models, the odontoid fracture stabilized by atlantoaxial fixation and the atlas fracture sta-bilized by occipitocervical fixation were simulated.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (pedicle screw group); in the occipitocervical fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+occipital screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+occipital screws (pedicle screw group).Three different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws (horizontal, oblique and vertical) were applied.The range of motion (ROM) was measured in extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of occipitocervical bodies (C0-C3) after internal fixation.Results:Compared with the intact models, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were obviously reduced in the spinous process screw group and the pedicle screw group in the models with atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were greater in the spinous process screw group than in the pedicle screw group; in the occipitocervical fixation, the spinous process screw group had greater ROM of lateral flexion of C1-C2 and greater ROM of rotation of C0-C2 than the pedicle screw group.There were unobvious differences in insertion of spinous process screws between the horizontal, oblique and vertical techniques.Conclusions:In the atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations, the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw can provide as fine stability as the bilateral axis pedicle screws.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.In the occipitocervical fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 in lateral flexion and rotation than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw. The 3 different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws lead to an unobvious difference in the stability of C1-C2.

Biomechanical evaluation of reinsertion and revision screws in the subaxial cervical vertebrae

Biomechanical and Clinical Study of Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation for Treatment of Traumatic Instability of C1-C2 Joint

Anterior Cervical Transpedicular Screw Fixation System in Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Finite Element Comparative Study.

Superior cortical screw in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: A biomechanics and microstructure-based study.

Research into the anatomy of the subaxial cervical pedicle for ensuring screw insertion safety

Periphery Transacetabular Screws Fixation in Contour Revision Cup: a Cadaveric Biomechanical Study in Vitro

Revision of pedicle screw applied to low Imnbar disease postoperatively

Spinous Process Screw Fixation: A Salvage Technique in Subaxial Cervical Spinal Instrumentation

Biomechanical Research on Contour Cage with Transacetabular Screws Fixation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw: a finite element analysis

Biomechanical characterization of vertebral body replacement in situ: Effects of different fixation strategies

Does pedicle screw fixation of the subaxial cervical spine provide adequate stabilization in a multilevel vertebral body fracture model? An in vitro biomechanical study

Single use of transarticular screws in atlantoaxial instability

Biomechanical Evaluation of an Adaptive-Motion Pedicle Screw Fixation System: Experimental and Numerical Analysis

Application of cortical bone trajectory screw in the revision of lumbar disease

Biomechanical Analysis of Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine

Improving C1 Pedicle Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Instability with Ultrasonic Bone Burr Assistance

Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Reinsertion Along the Same Trajectory in a Validated 3D-Printed Synthetic Bone Model

The biomechanical study of craniovertebral junction fixation with posterior transarticular screw]

Biomechanical Evaluation of Transfacet Screw Fixation for Stabilization of Multilevel Cervical Corpectomies