A comparative in vitro study of distinct and novel stent geometries on mechanical performances of poly‐L‐lactic acid cardiovascular stents
Jinwoo Kim,Jung Ho Lee,Eun Ae Choi,Hyeon Ji Lee,Jin Oh,Dae‐Heung Byeon,Chan Hee Park
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14893
2024-10-26
Artificial Organs
Abstract:Four different types of stent geometries were proposed for cardiovascular applications to improve mechanical properties of poly‐L‐lactic acid bioresorbable stents. Five key mechanical tests were evaluated, including radial strength, crimping profile, flexibility, elastic recoil, and foreshortening. M2 and M3 would be a suitable option for employing poly‐L‐lactic acid bioresorbable stents: M2 with high flexibility and sufficient radial strength would be preferred for complex lesions, and M3 advantageous in radial elastic recoil would be an optimum selection for mild target sites. Background Poly‐L‐lactic acid (PLLA) is one of the representative polymeric materials serving as bioresorbable stents (BRS) for cardiovascular disease due to its proper biodegradation, high biocompatibility, and adequate mechanical properties among polymer candidates for BRS. However, PLLA BRS as cardiovascular stents also have limitations because their mechanical properties including low radial strength and high elastic recoil are inferior to those of metallic‐based BRS stents. Methods In the study, we developed and manufactured distinct and novel types of stent geometries for investigating mechanical properties of thin‐walled PLLA BRS (110 μm) for cardiovascular applications. Five key mechanical tests, including radial strength, crimping profile, flexibility, elastic recoil, and foreshortening were performed through a comprehensive analysis. In addition, we applied the finite element method for further validation and insight of mechanical behaviors of the PLLA BRS. Results Results revealed that Model 2 had advantages in high flexibility as well as radial strengths, which would be a proper option for complex and acutely curved lesions. Model 3 would be an optimum selection for stent placement in mild target site due to its strength in minimum elastic recoil. Even though Model 4 showed the highest radial strength, finite element simulation showed that the geometry caused higher maximum stress than that of Model 2 and Model 3 during the crimping process. Model 1 showed the most vulnerable geometry among the tested models in both in vitro and finite element analysis. Conclusion Such data may suggest potential guidance in regard to understanding the mechanical behaviors of PLLA BRS as not only applicable cardiovascular but also peripheral and intracranial stents.
engineering, biomedical,transplantation