The foundations of sexuality: Maurice Merleau-Ponty's conception of sexuality and its place in his philosophy
Maryellen MacGuigan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-17477
Abstract:ion. The dichotomy of language as thing and language as production of speaking subjects must be surpassed. The notion of Gestalt or structure can be of service, since it allows us to bring meaning and facts together. Ni chose, ni idee, la langue, comme le psychisme, n'est accessible qu'a une methode de "comprehension" qui retrouve dans la multiplicity des faits quelques intentions ou visees decisives . . .19 In setting out to establish sociology as a science, Durkheim recommended that the social be treated "comme une chose," as a thing. But we find that if the social is conceived as a thing, external to the individual, his relationship to it is incomprehensible. A society is not a thing, that is, a sum of mutually external parts; 1ft 19 Ibid., pp. 150-51. Ibid., pp. 154-55. 25 it is a totality, ". . . ou les phenomenes s'expriment 2Q mutuellement et admettent un meme theme fondamental." Once again, our notion of objective scientific knowledge must be revised. The social is intersubjectivity: . . . a son plus haut point, la connaissance sociologique, comme la connaissance de quelqu'un, exige que nous reprenions, en nous guidant sur tous les indices objectifs, 1'attitude humaine qui fait l'esprit d'une societe.l The historian has to pick his way carefully between the temptation, on the one hand, to adopt the standpoint of a Universal History, an absolutely objective knowledge having direct access to all times and finding meaning in all events; and, on the other hand, to take the point of view of scientism, reducing all events to the same level of "mere" fact and attributing no meaning to any of them. His task is to reawaken the past: to understand it in its own terms, and then to evaluate it. Through our own historical situation, we rejoin another, and perceive it as it was for itself. History, like sociology, presents us with a problem of communication. Nous n'atteignons pas l'universel en quittant notre particularity, mais en faisant d'elleun moyen d'atteindre les autres, en vertu de cette mysterieuse affinite qui fait que les situations se comprennent entre elles.22 The sciences of man are metaphysical in the sense that they reveal to us a dimension of being Ibid., p. 158. Ibid., p. 158.
Philosophy