Factors of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and recovery of vocal cord movement in thyroid surgery
Kazufumi Obata,Makoto Kurose,Akito Kakiuchi,Kenichi Takano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2024.08.006
IF: 2.119
Auris Nasus Larynx
Abstract:Objective: Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis is one of the complications of thyroid surgery, and the prevention and management of paralysis is an important issue for surgeons. In this study, in order to gain further understanding of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after thyroid surgery, we analyzed and examined the usefulness of nerve stimulators for recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and the factors that may cause recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Furthermore, in cases where transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis occurred, we analyzed and examined the timing of improvement in vocal cord movement for each intraoperative finding and intraoperative operation that caused the paralysis. Methods: At the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, between January 2012 and December 2021, the subjects were 543 thyroid surgery cases (692 nerves) without preoperative paralysis or cancer nerve invasion performed. The relationship between postoperative transient and permanent paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. The factors evaluated were gender, age, BMI, total thyroidectomy, benignity, malignancy, Graves' disease, using IIONM (intermittent intraoperative nerve monitoring), using CIONM (continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring), malignant tumor T3b or higher, with lateral neck dissection, and years of experience of the surgeon. Furthermore, by targeting 87 nerves with transient paralysis, surgical operations were divided into three groups: minor injury, major injury, and adhesion, and their relationship with the timing of postoperative vocal fold movement improvement was evaluated. Results: Permanent paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve occurred in 12 nerves (1.7 %), and transient paralysis occurred in 100 nerves (14.5 %). Univariate analysis showed no association with each factor, but multivariate analysis showed that transient paralysis was significantly lower in men and in patients using IIONM. The improvement time for vocal cord paralysis was 2.8 months in the minor injury group, 4.5 months in the major injury group, and 3.2 months in the adhesion group, indicating a statistically significant difference between the minor injury group and the major injury group. Conclusion: This study suggests that the use of IIONM and gentle manipulation of women may prevent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis during thyroid surgery. In addition, understanding the period of nerve recovery for each operation for postoperative transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis may contribute to patient explanations and determining the timing of therapeutic intervention for speech improvement surgery.