Intraoperative neuromonitoring versus visual nerve identification for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery.

Roberto Cirocchi,Alberto Arezzo,Vito D'Andrea,Iosief Abraha,Georgi I Popivanov,Nicola Avenia,Chiara Gerardi,Brandon Michael Henry,Justus Randolph,Marcin Barczyñski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012483.pub2
IF: 8.4
2019-10-04
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract:Injuries to the recurrent inferior laryngeal nerve (RILN) remain one of the major post-operative complications after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Damage to this nerve can result in a temporary or permanent palsy, which is associated with vocal cord paresis or paralysis. Visual identification of the RILN is a common procedure to prevent nerve injury during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Recently, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been introduced in order to facilitate the localisation of the nerves and to prevent their injury during surgery. IONM permits nerve identification using an electrode, where, in order to measure the nerve response, the electric field is converted to an acoustic signal.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) can prevent recurrent laryngeal nerve (RILN) injury more effectively than visual nerve identification alone in adult thyroid surgery. Specifically, the study focuses on the following points: 1. **Permanent RILN paralysis**: Evaluate whether IONM can reduce the incidence of permanent RILN paralysis more than visual nerve identification alone. 2. **Temporary RILN paralysis**: Evaluate whether IONM can reduce the incidence of temporary RILN paralysis more than visual nerve identification alone. 3. **Other adverse events**: Evaluate whether IONM can reduce other adverse events other than RILN paralysis, such as temporary hypocalcemia, more than visual nerve identification alone. 4. **Surgical time**: Evaluate whether IONM has an impact on surgical time compared with visual nerve identification alone. 5. **All - cause mortality**: Evaluate whether IONM has an impact on all - cause mortality compared with visual nerve identification alone. The paper uses the methods of systematic review and meta - analysis to synthesize the data of multiple randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of IONM in these aspects. However, the research results show that there is currently no conclusive evidence that IONM is superior or inferior to visual nerve identification alone in any of the evaluated outcome indicators. Therefore, well - designed, strictly - executed, and standardized - analyzed and - reported randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow - up periods are needed to further verify the effect of IONM.