Abstract:Anxious about the failure of decisionmakers to significantly reduce ‘the human impact’ on Earth, many global change researchers are looking for ways and means to influence public policy, business strategy and civil society more strongly. As part of this, there is a greater emphasis on understanding and altering the ‘human dimensions’ of global environmental change. A number of physical and society‐environment geographers are involved in this endeavour, building on some valuable past achievements. But what lies ahead? I address this question by examining the rich idea of a ‘social contract’ – one little used in disciplinary debates about Geography's past, present and future, but now relatively common in certain wider discussions of anthropogenic global change. I suggest that there are currents of thinking in contemporary Geography that can offer something both new and much needed in the world of global change research. That ‘something’ is not ever more integrated, accurate analysis of dynamic, coupled human–environment interactions – as if we live in just one world requiring ever more ‘joined‐up’ and granular description, explanation and prediction. Instead, it is an approach to research that eschews ontological holism, epistemological monism and the fact–value dualism. This approach suggests that taking the human dimensions of environmental change seriously requires a new kind of global change research that is at once overtly political and intellectually plural. Far from being a charter for ‘bias’ or ‘relativism’, I show that this approach expresses the rich senses of responsibility, accountability and representation contained in the version of a new social contract I advocate here. A wider implication of my argument is that Geography needs new stories about the nature and merits of ‘intra‐disciplinarity’, ones better attuned to the role of research in fostering democracy in our ‘post‐normal’ times. Thinking afresh about how research should influence society promises to alter many geographers’ sense of self while usefully repurposing global change research across several disciplines.

Gaia and the repositioning of the state territoriality: A dialogue with critical geopolitical ecology

Toward an Upgrade of Gaia-politics: A View from the East Asian Critical Zone

Geoethical futures: A call for more-than-human physical geography

Will the real people's geography please stand up? Community, public, and participatory geographies in conversation

A Place at the End of a Road: A Yin-Yang Geography

Spatial Humanities and Geo-computation for Social Sciences:Advances and Applications

PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY

Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday

Critical Political Geography and the Development of Antarctic Geo-politics

Unity of Geography beyond Dichotomy of Physical and Human Geography

Expanding Geoethics: Interrelations with Geoenvironmental Education and Sense of Place

Geography and the new social contract for global change research

Critical Geography's nature problem and the Lefebvrian ecological dialectic

The geo domain: a review on the conceptualization of geographical and geopolitical entities

History and philosophy of geography I: Decolonising the discipline, diversifying archives and historicising radicalism

On the question of the philosophical foundations of the geoecotones theory: synergetics, anthropocentrism, geosystem paradigm

Distant time and the spatio-temporalities of statecraft

The Territorialization of the Global Commons: Evidence From Ocean Governance

Geographies of public space: Variegated publicness, variegated epistemologies

Geographies of science and technology II: In the critical zone

Introducing Critical Physical Geography