Abstract:When pristine testing conditions are used, an eyewitness's high-confidence identification from a lineup can be a reliable predictor of their identification accuracy (Wixted & Wells, 2017). Further, Grabman, Dobolyi, Berelovich, and Dodson (2019) found that high-confidence identifications are more predictive of accuracy for individuals with stronger than weaker face recognition ability. We extend this research by investigating why strong face recognizers make more informative confidence judgments and fewer high-confidence errors through the framework of two different accounts: the optimality account (Deffenbacher, 1980) and the decision processes account (e.g., Kruger & Dunning, 1999). The optimality account holds that differences in the predictive value of confidence ratings made by strong versus weak face recognizers are a result of differences in the quality of their memory representations for faces, indicating that confidence-accuracy calibration would be equated between these two groups when overall accuracy is equated, whereas the decision processes account attributes differences in calibration to strong face recognizers' superior metacognitive skills, which allow them to better evaluate their performance in the domain of face recognition. Therefore, to distinguish between these accounts, we manipulated exposure and retention interval to create conditions that produced comparable levels of identification accuracy between stronger and weaker face recognizers, and then examined their confidence-accuracy calibration. The decision processes account was supported, as differences in calibration between stronger and weaker face recognizers persisted even when overall identification accuracy was equated. Stronger face recognizers are better able to regulate their use of the confidence scale points with changes in identification accuracy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Reframing Confidence Instructions to Child Eyewitness Reduces Overconfidence but Does Not Improve Confidence–Accuracy Calibration

Children's strategic regulation during a confidence lineup paradigm

Reflector variables in augmented reality lineups: Assessing eyewitness identification reliability in children and adults with confidence, response time, and proximity to the lineup

Evaluating eyewitnesses: Translating expressions of pre‐ and post‐identification confidence

Convicting with confidence? Why we should not over-rely on eyewitness confidence

Children presume confident informants will be accurate (until proven otherwise)

Improving the diagnostic value of lineup rejections

Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions

A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.

Developmental trends in lineup performance: Adolescents are more prone to innocent bystander misidentifications than children and adults

Variability in verbal eyewitness confidence

Eyewitness confidence in the interviewing context: Understanding the impact of question type and order

Do Confidence Ratings Reactively Modify Children's Academic Assessment Performance? Negative Answer from a Three-Year Longitudinal Study

Justifying Responses Affects the Relationship Between Confidence and Accuracy

In the Presence and Absence of Conflicting Testimony, Children's Selective Trust in the In-Group Informant in Moral Judgment and Knowledge Access.

A lifespan study of the confidence–accuracy relation in working memory and episodic long-term memory.

The effects of advice and "try more" instructions on improving realism of confidence

Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing

Response bias modulates the confidence‐accuracy relationship for both positive identifications and lineup rejections in a simultaneous lineup task

Jury instructions should prioritize reflector variables recorded during the first test of an eyewitness' memory.

Updating trust: How children combine trait information with prior accuracy as they interact with an informant.