Abstract:This paper extends the work done by Titchmarsh on Gram's Law (an attempt to locate the zeroes of the zeta-function on the critical line). Herewith it is shown that a positive proportion of Gram intervals violate Gram's Law; and also that a weaker notion of Gram's Law is valid over a positive proportion of intervals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the validity of Gram's law regarding the zero - point distribution of the Riemann ζ - function. Specifically, the author Timothy Trudgian studied the performance of Gram's law and its weak form in detecting the non - trivial zeros of the Riemann ζ - function.
### Problem Background
The non - trivial zeros of the Riemann ζ - function \(\zeta(s)\) are restricted within the critical strip \(0\leq\Re(s)\leq1\). Finding the specific locations of these zeros is an important mathematical problem. To detect these zeros, Gram introduced a method, known as Gram's law. According to Gram's law, if there is a zero between adjacent Gram points, then there is exactly one zero within this interval.
### Gram's Law and Its Weaknesses
Although Gram's law has shown a certain degree of effectiveness in early applications, it is known to fail in certain cases. Specifically:
- **Gram's law**: There is exactly one zero within each Gram interval \((g_n, g_{n + 1}]\).
- **Weak Gram's law**: There is at least one zero within each Gram interval \((g_n, g_{n + 1}]\).
Previous studies have shown that both Gram's law and the weak Gram's law will fail infinitely many times. However, these studies did not clearly indicate the proportion of failures.
### Main Contributions of the Paper
The main contribution of this paper lies in proving that Gram's law and its weak form will fail at a certain proportion. Specifically, the author proved the following two theorems:
1. **Theorem 1**: For a sufficiently large \(T\), between the heights \(T\) and \(2T\), the proportion of failures of Gram's law is positive.
2. **Theorem 2**: For a sufficiently large \(T\), between the heights \(T\) and \(2T\), the proportion of failures of the weak Gram's law is positive.
In addition, the author also proved that the weak Gram's law is effective at a certain proportion (Theorem 3).
### Formula Summary
Some of the key formulas involved in the paper include:
- Riemann - Siegel function:
\[
Z(t)=e^{i\theta(t)}\zeta\left(\frac{1}{2}+it\right)
\]
where,
\[
\theta(t)\sim\frac{t}{2}\log\frac{t}{2\pi}+O(t)
\]
- The value of the ζ - function at the Gram point:
\[
\zeta\left(\frac{1}{2}+ig_n\right)=(- 1)^nZ(g_n)
\]
- The relationship between the S - function and the number of zeros:
\[
S(T)=N(T)-\frac{\theta(T)}{\pi}-1
\]
Through these formulas and analysis, the author demonstrated the failure situations of Gram's law and its weak form within specific intervals and gave an estimate of the proportion of failures.
### Conclusion
Through in - depth analysis of the S - function, this paper proved the failure situations of Gram's law and its weak form at a certain proportion, further deepening the understanding of the zero - point distribution of the Riemann ζ - function.