Thermal Conductivity from Core and Well log Data

Andreas Hartmann,Volker Rath,Christoph Clauser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.05.015
2008-06-15
Abstract:The relationships between thermal conductivity and other petrophysical properties have been analysed for a borehole drilled in a Tertiary Flysch sequence. We establish equations that permit us to predict rock thermal conductivity from logging data. A regression analysis of thermal conductivity, bulk density, and sonic velocity yields thermal conductivity with an average accuracy of better than 0.2 W/(m K). As a second step, logging data is used to compute a lithological depth profile, which in turn is used to calculate a thermal conductivity profile. From a comparison of the conductivity-depth profile and the laboratory data it can be concluded that thermal conductivity can be computed with an accuracy of less than 0.3 W/(m K)from conventional wireline data. The comparison of two different models shows that this approach can be practical even if old and incomplete logging data is used. The results can be used to infer thermal conductivity for boreholes without appropriate core data that are drilled in a similar geological setting.
Geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the problem of predicting rock thermal conductivity from conventional logging data in geological boreholes. Specifically, the researchers analyzed the relationship between thermal conductivity and other geophysical properties and established equations to allow the prediction of rock thermal conductivity from logging data. This method is significant for boreholes that lack appropriate core data but have similar geological environments. ### Main Objectives: 1. **Improve the accuracy of thermal conductivity prediction**: By using regression analysis to link parameters such as thermal conductivity, bulk density, and sonic velocity to predict thermal conductivity. 2. **Calculate thermal conductivity profiles using conventional logging data**: First, generate geological depth profiles using logging data, then calculate thermal conductivity profiles. 3. **Evaluate the applicability of different methods**: Compare the applicability and accuracy of direct methods and component methods under different geological conditions. ### Background: - **Study Area**: German Molasse Basin, where geothermal methods are being studied to determine the flow rate of deep groundwater. - **Need**: Detailed and high-resolution thermal conductivity data are required to calculate the steady-state conductive temperature field. - **Challenge**: Core material is limited in some layers and lacks spatial coverage. Logging data, however, provides better spatial coverage and depth resolution. ### Methods: 1. **Direct Method**: Directly associate logging measurements with thermal conductivity through empirical relationships. 2. **Component Method**: Identify major mineral or rock components, derive the volume fractions of these components from conventional logging data, and then calculate the effective thermal conductivity by combining the thermal conductivity values of each component. ### Results: - **Prediction Accuracy**: Through regression analysis, the average prediction accuracy of thermal conductivity can reach 0.2 W/(m·K). - **Method Comparison**: Both methods show good applicability under different geological conditions, achieving good results even with old and incomplete logging data. - **Application Prospects**: This method can be used for boreholes without appropriate core data but with similar geological environments, thereby improving sparse geothermal databases. ### Conclusion: This study successfully demonstrates how to predict rock thermal conductivity from conventional logging data and validates the effectiveness and accuracy of this method under different geological conditions. It provides new tools and methods to improve the efficiency and accuracy of geothermal research.