Abstract:Natural methane emissions have received significant attention in recent years due to the documented increase in atmospheric concentrations of methane and its elevated global warming potential relative to CO 2 . Over the past decades, the Arctic has been warming nearly four times faster than the rest of the planet (Rantanen et al., 2022). Arctic amplification of global warming drives a pressing need to assess the current and future vulnerability of natural methane accumulations under continued high latitude warming.Methane accumulations exist in a variety of Arctic settings, including deep-water marine environments, shallow-water continental shelves and fjords hosting relict subsea permafrost and gas hydrate, in and beneath onshore permafrost, and beneath glaciers and the Greenland Ice Sheet. Continued climate warming is making increased methane leakage from these accumulations more likely. Even deeper conventional gas reservoirs could leak methane as the overlying permafrost and gas hydrates degrade. These topics were the focus of "Methane in a Changing Arctic," a conference convened by the Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrates, Environment and Climate (CAGE) at UiT-The Arctic University of Norway from 14-16 September, 2022. CAGE was a Norwegian Centre of Excellence funded by the Research Council of Norway from 2013 to 2023, and a key focus of CAGE's research was related to the interaction between Arctic climate change and methane emissions.CAGE's research legacy, along with the 2022 conference, sparked interest in developing the Frontiers Research Topic that has now produced 15 original research articles. These studies cover all aspects of methane migration, starting with the geosphere (e.g., sub-seafloor methane reservoirs) through the biosphere (e.g., microbes consuming this methane and acting as a critical sink) to the hydrosphere (e.g., ocean, other waters), the cryosphere (e.g., permafrost sediments, ice sheets, and glaciers) and potentially into the atmosphere. The papers collectively contribute to improved understanding of complex high-latitude methane emissions. The studies investigate timescales from the Pleistocene Ice Ages to the present, demonstrating how past methane seepage histories may inform future climate scenarios.Methane in the geosphere: subsurface thermogenic, biogenic and abiotic sources Methane emitted from seafloor or terrestrial seeps has long been known to originate with biotic processes. At lower temperatures, microbial decomposition of organic matter produces gas that has sometimes been referred to as biogenic. At higher temperatures, thermal cracking of heavier hydrocarbons at deeper depths generates thermogenic gas. Both microbial and thermogenic gases are considered biotic in origin owing to their ultimate reliance on organic matter as a substrate. It has also been suggested that methane can be generated abiotically during serpentinization of ultramafic rocks (Proskurowski et al. 2008;Cannat et al. 2010) in slow-to ultraslow-spreading mid-oceanic ridge environments.In the Barents Sea, widespread seafloor seeps regularly emit thermogenic gases, reflecting the basin's status as a major hydrocarbon province characterized by deep oil and gas reservoirs. Serov et al. explore the origin of Barents Sea seeps, underscoring the role that Cenozoic tectonic uplift and extensive Quaternary glacial erosion (Lasabuda et al. 2021, Patton et al. 2022) have played in reducing the thickness of unlithified overburden sediment that could host widespread microbial methane generation. Analyses by Chand, Brunstad et al. of seep emissions at the Loppa High in the Southwest Barents Sea confirm a deep-seated thermogenic origin but also suggest significant microbial modification of gas chemistry during syn-and postglacial storage of gas that had migrated into shallow sediments. The study postulates that water percolation through open faults could play a role in some seep gases being characterized by less than purely thermogenic composition.Studies of abiotic methane remain relatively novel. In the eastern Fram Strait, Johnson et al. (2015) have suggested abiotic methane as the gas source for a long-lived hydrate system on young oceanic crust. Chand, Knies et al. investigate gas flares in this area, concluding that the gas primarily originates from thermal cracking of organic material (thermogenic process), with a minor contribution from possible abiotic crustal/mantle sources.Extensive seafloor methane seepage has been detected in a variety of settings, including at high latitudes. Although seafloor gas releases at greater than ~100 metres below sea level (mbsl) are unlikely to have a direct impact on atmospheric methane concentrations owing to the strong sink of water column aerobic methane oxidation (e.g., Ruppel and Kessler, 2017), the seeps still play a critical role in the carbon cycle and ocean chemistry and as hosts for seafloor chemosynthetic communit -Abstract Truncated-

Surface networks in the Arctic may miss a future methane bomb

Estimating methane emissions in the Arctic nations using surface observations from 2008 to 2019

Vulnerability of Arctic-Boreal methane emissions to climate change

Atmospheric constraints on changing Arctic CH4 emissions

Increasing Methane Emissions and Widespread Cold‐Season Release From High‐Arctic Regions Detected Through Atmospheric Measurements

Methane emissions from Arctic landscapes during 2000–2015: an analysis with land and lake biogeochemistry models

Highest methane concentrations in an Arctic river linked to local terrestrial inputs

Disentangling methane and carbon dioxide sources and transport across the Russian Arctic from aircraft measurements

Reduced net methane emissions due to microbial methane oxidation in a warmer Arctic

Arctic soil methane sink increases with drier conditions and higher ecosystem respiration

Methane transport from the active layer to lakes in the Arctic using Toolik Lake, Alaska, as a case study

Editorial: Natural methane emissions in a changing arctic – implications for climate and environment

Regional Sources and CH4 Seasonal Cycle in Central Siberia and the Arctic: Observations and Numerical Calculations

Shallow and deep groundwater moderate methane dynamics in a high Arctic glacial catchment

Winter precipitation and snow accumulation drive the methane sink or source strength of Arctic tussock tundra

Mismatch of N release from the permafrost and vegetative uptake opens pathways of increasing nitrous oxide emissions in the high Arctic

Environmental controls on ecosystem-scale cold-season methane and carbon dioxide fluxes in an Arctic tundra ecosystem

Manifestation of Gas Seepage from Bottom Sediments on the Sea Surface: Theoretical Model and Experimental Observations

Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic

Much stronger tundra methane emissions during autumn freeze than spring thaw

Year-round trace gas measurements in the central Arctic during the MOSAiC expedition