Highest methane concentrations in an Arctic river linked to local terrestrial inputs

Karel Castro-Morales,Anna Canning,Sophie Arzberger,Will A. Overholt,Kirsten Küsel,Olaf Kolle,Mathias Göckede,Nikita Zimov,Arne Körtzinger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5059-2022
2022-11-05
Biogeosciences Discussions
Abstract:Large amounts of methane ( CH 4 ) could be released as a result of the gradual or abrupt thawing of Arctic permafrost due to global warming. Once available, this potent greenhouse gas is emitted into the atmosphere or transported laterally into aquatic ecosystems via hydrologic connectivity at the surface or via groundwaters. While high northern latitudes contribute up to 5 % of total global CH 4 emissions, the specific contribution of Arctic rivers and streams is largely unknown. We analyzed high-resolution continuous CH 4 concentrations measured between 15 and 17 June 2019 (late freshet) in a ∼120 km transect of the Kolyma River in northeast Siberia. The average partial pressure of CH 4 ( p CH 4 ) in tributaries (66.8–206.8 μatm ) was 2–7 times higher than in the main river channel (28.3 μatm ). In the main channel, CH 4 was up to 1600 % supersaturated with respect to atmospheric equilibrium. Key sites along the riverbank and at tributary confluences accounted for 10 % of the navigated transect and had the highest p CH 4 (41 ± 7 μatm ) and CH 4 emissions (0.03 ± 0.004 mmolm-2d-1 ) compared to other sites in the main channel, contributing between 14 % to 17 % of the total CH 4 flux in the transect. These key sites were characterized by warm waters ( T >14.5 ∘ C ) and low specific conductivities ( κ <88 μS cm −1 ). The distribution of CH 4 in the river could be linked statistically to T and κ of the water and to their proximity to the shore z , and these parameters served as predictors of CH 4 concentrations in unsampled river areas. The abundance of CH 4 -consuming bacteria and CH 4 -producing archaea in the river was similar to those previously detected in nearby soils and was also strongly correlated to T and κ . These findings imply that the source of riverine CH 4 is closely related with sites near land. The average total CH 4 flux density in the river section was 0.02 ± 0.006 mmolm-2d-1 , equivalent to an annual CH 4 flux of 1.24×10 7 g CH 4 yr −1 emitted during a 146 d open water season. Our study highlights the importance of high-resolution continuous CH 4 measurements in Arctic rivers for identifying spatial and temporal variations, as well as providing a glimpse of the magnitude of riverine CH 4 emissions in the Arctic and their potential relevance to regional CH 4 budgets.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?