Fluvial carbon dioxide emissions peak at the permafrost thawing front in the Western Siberia Lowland

Ivan V. Krickov,Artem G. Lim,Liudmila S. Shirokova,Mikhail А. Korets,Oleg S. Pokrovsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173491
IF: 9.8
2024-05-30
The Science of The Total Environment
Abstract:In order to foresee the impact of permafrost thaw on CO 2 emissions by high-latitude rivers, in-situ measurements across a permafrost and climate/vegetation gradient, coupled with assessment of possible physico-chemical and landscape controlling factors are necessary. Here we chose 34 catchments of variable stream order (1 to 9) and watershed size (1 to >10 5 km 2 ) located across a permafrost and biome gradient in the Western Siberian Lowland (WSL), from the permafrost-free southern taiga to the continuous permafrost zone of tundra. Across the south-north transect, maximal CO 2 emissions (2.2 ± 1.1 g C-CO 2 m −2 d −1 ) occurred from rivers of the discontinuous/sporadic permafrost zone, i.e., geographical permafrost thawing boundary. In this transitional zone, fluvial C emission to downstream export ratio was as high as 8.0, which greatly (x 10) exceeded the ratio in the permafrost free and continuous permafrost zones. Such a high evasion at the permafrost thawing front can stem from an optimal combination of multiple environmental factors: maximal active layer thickness, sizable C stock in soils, and mobilization of labile organic nutrients from dispersed peat ice that enhanced DOC and POC processing in the water column, likely due to priming effect. Via a substituting space for time approach, we foresee an increase in CO 2 and CH 4 fluvial evasion in the continuous and discontinuous permafrost zone, which is notably linked to the greening of tundra increases in biomass of the riparian vegetation, river water warming and thermokarst lake formation on the watershed.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?