How to create a universe

Gordon McCabe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0702239

2007-02-28

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is (i) to expound the specification of a universe, according to those parts of mathematical physics which have been experimentally and observationally verified in our own universe; and (ii) to expound the possible means of creating a universe in the laboratory.

General Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Universe creation on a computer

Gordon McCabe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.04.002

2005-11-14

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to provide an account of the epistemology and metaphysics of universe creation on a computer.

General Physics
Joining inner space to outer space

Gordon McCabe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0703221

2007-03-23

General Physics

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that it is possible, in principle, to obtain knowledge of the entire universe at the present time, even if the radius of the universe is much larger than the radius of the observable universe.
The Duality of the Universe

Gordon McCabe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0805.3664

2008-05-24

Abstract:It is proposed that the physical universe is an instance of a mathematical structure which possesses a dual structure, and that this dual structure is the collection of all possible knowledge of the physical universe. In turn, the physical universe is then the dual space of the latter.

General Physics
Solitons as Key Parts to Produce a Universe in the Laboratory

Stefano Ansoldi,Eduardo I. Guendelman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9113-0

2007-04-24

Foundations of Physics

Abstract:Cosmology is usually understood as an observational science, where experimentation plays no role. It is interesting, nevertheless, to change this perspective addressing the following question: what should we do to create a universe, in a laboratory? It appears, in fact, that this is, in principle, possible according to at least two different paradigms; both allow to circumvent singularity theorems, i.e. the necessity of singularities in the past of inflating domains which have the required properties to generate a universe similar to ours. The first of them is substantially classical, and is built up considering solitons which collide with surrounding topological defects, generating an inflationary domain of space–time. The second is, instead, partly quantum and considers the possibility of tunnelling of past-non-singular regions of spacetime into an inflating universe, following a well-known instanton proposal. We are, here, going to review some of these models, as well as highlight possible extensions, generalizations and the open issues (as for instance the detectability of child universes and the properties of quantum tunnelling processes) that still affect the description of their dynamics. In doing so we will remark how the works on this subject can represent virtual laboratories to test the role that fundamental principles of physics (particularly, the interplay of quantum and general relativistic realms) played in the formation of our universe.

physics, multidisciplinary
On space-time structure and the Universe: some issues of concept and principle

Naresh Dadhich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0405

2022-08-22

Abstract:In this discourse, we would like to discuss some issues of concept and principle in the context of the following three aspects. One, how [Formula: see text] arises as a constant of space-time structure on the same footing as the velocity of light. These are the two constants innate to space-time without reference to any force or dynamics whatsoever, and are interwoven in the geometry of 'free' homogeneous space-time. Two, how does the vacuum energy gravitate? Could its gravitational interaction in principle be included in general relativity or a new theory of quantum space-time/gravity would be required? Finally, we would like to raise the fundamental question: How does the Universe physically expand? Since there does not lie anything outside into which it can expand, instead it has to expand on its own-maybe by creating new space-time out of nothing at each instant and at every location! Thus not only was the Universe created at some instant in the past marking the beginning in the Big Bang, it is in fact being created continuously at each epoch as it expands. We thus need quantum theory of space-time/gravity for fully understanding the working of the Universe. This article is part of the theme issue 'The future of mathematical cosmology, Volume 2'.
Unweaving the Fabric of the Universe: The Interplay between Mathematics and Physics

Mairi Sakellariadou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1407.3934

2014-07-15

Abstract:Our conventional understanding of space-time, as well as our notion of geometry, break down once we attempt to describe the very early stages of the evolution of our universe. The extreme physical conditions near the Big Bang necessitate an intimate interplay between physics and mathematics. The main challenge is the construction of a theory of quantum gravity, the long-sought unification of Einstein's general relativity with quantum mechanics. There are several attempts to formulate such a theory; they can be tested against experimental and observational results coming from high energy physics and astrophysics, leading to a remarkable interplay between gravity, particle physics and cosmology.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Theory
String/M-theories About Our World Are Testable in the traditional Physics Way

Gordon L. Kane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.07511

2016-01-28

Abstract:Some physicists hope to use string/M-theory to construct a comprehensive underlying theory of our physical world a "final theory". Can such a theory be tested? A quantum theory of gravity must be formulated in 10 dimensions, so obviously testing it experimentally requires projecting it onto our 4D world (called "compactification"). Most string theorists study theories, including aspects such as AdS/CFT, not phenomena, and are not much interested in testing theories beyond the Standard Model about our world. Compactified theories generically have many realistic features whose necessary presence provides some tests, such as gravity, Yang-Mills forces like the Standard Model ones, chiral fermions that lead to parity violation, softly broken supersymmetry, Higgs physics, families, hierarchical fermion masses and more. All tests of theories in physics have always depended on assumptions and approximate calculations, and tests of compactified string/M-theories do too. String phenomenologists have also formulated some explicit tests for compactified theories. In particular, I give examples of tests from compactified M-theory (involving Higgs physics, predictions for superpartners at LHC, electric dipole moments, and more). It is clear that compactified theories exist that can describe worlds like ours, and it is clear that even if a multiverse were real it does not prevent us from finding comprehensive compactified theories like one that might describe our world. I also discuss what we might mean by a final theory, what we might want it to explain, and comment briefly on multiverse issues from the point of view of finding a theory that describes our world.

High Energy Physics - Theory,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Computational universes

Karl Svozil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2004.11.055

2005-04-14

Abstract:Suspicions that the world might be some sort of a machine or algorithm existing ``in the mind'' of some symbolic number cruncher have lingered from antiquity. Although popular at times, the most radical forms of this idea never reached mainstream. Modern developments in physics and computer science have lent support to the thesis, but empirical evidence is needed before it can begin to replace our contemporary world view.

General Physics
Bell's Theory of Beables and the Concept of `Universe'

Ian T. Durham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.02143

2018-05-06

Abstract:From its earliest days nearly a century ago, quantum mechanics has proven itself to be a tremendously accurate yet intellectually unsatisfying theory to many. Not the least of its problems is that it is a theory about the results of measurements. As John Bell once said in introducing the concept of `beables', it should be possible to say what is rather than merely what is observed. In this essay I consider the question of whether a universe can be a (nonlocal) beable and what that implies about the fundamental nature of that universe. I conclude that a universe that is a beable within the framework of certain theories, cannot also be fundamental.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
Can the Universe create itself?

J. Richard Gott,Li-Xin Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.023501

IF: 5.407

1998-01-01

Physical Review D

Abstract:The question of first-cause has troubled philosophers and cosmologists alike. Now that it is apparent that our universe began in a big bang explosion, the question of what happened before the big bang arises. Inflation seems like a very promising answer, but as Borde and Vilenkin have shown, the inflationary state preceding the big bang could not have been infinite in duration-it must have had a beginning also. Where did it come from? Ultimately, the difficult question seems to be how to make something out of nothing. This paper explores the idea that this is the wrong question-that that is not how the Universe got here. Instead, we explore the idea of whether there is anything in the laws of physics that would prevent the Universe from creating itself. Because spacetimes can be curved and multiply connected, general relativity allows for the possibility of closed timelike curves (CTCs). Thus, tracing backwards in time through the original inflationary state we may eventually encounter a region of CTCs-giving no first-cause. This region of CTCs may well be over by now (being bounded toward the future by a Cauchy horizon). We illustrate that such models-with CTCs-are not necessarily inconsistent by demonstrating self-consistent vacuums for Misner space and a multiply connected de Sitter space in which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not diverge as one approaches the Cauchy horizon and solves Einstein's equations. Some specific scenarios tout of many possible ones) for this type of model are described. For example, a metastable vacuum inflates producing an infinite number of (big-bang-type) bubble universes. In many of these, either by natural causes or by action of advanced civilizations, a number of bubbles of metastable vacuum are created at late times by high energy events. These bubbles will usually collapse and form black holes, but occasionally one will tunnel to create an expanding metastable vacuum (a baby universe) on the other side of the black hole's Einstein-Rosen bridge as proposed by Farhi, Guth, and Guven. One of the expanding metastable-vacuum baby universes produced in this way simply turns out to be the original inflating metastable vacuum we began with. We show that a Universe with CTCs can be stable against vacuum polarization. And it can be classically stable and self-consistent if and only if the potentials in this Universe are retarded-which gives a natural explanation of the arrow of time in our universe. Interestingly, the laws of physics may allow the Universe to be its own mother. [S0556-2821(98)00614-6].
Gambling on the existence of other universes

Arturo Sangalli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.01775

2016-07-06

Abstract:Speculations and theories about the existence of other worlds have a long history. In recent times, the arguments have shifted away from their typical philosophical and theological character to supposedly become more objective thanks to their scientific underpinnings. A prime example of this is the current parallel universes or multiverse theory, which has the support of a number of famous cosmologists. In this article, we contend that the claim for the existence of those parallel universes, as presented in Max Tegmark's book "Our Mathematical Universe", rests crucially on some questionable probability arguments involving infinity. As a result, a doubt is cast over the multiverse hypothesis: Is it more credible than the counterarguments based on philosophical and metaphysical considerations?

History and Philosophy of Physics
Creation of Matter in a Noncommutative Universe

T. Miller,M. Heller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.06932

2016-01-26

Abstract:The dark matter and dark energy problem, that is now dominating the research in cosmology, makes the question of the origin of mass-energy content of the universe more urgent than ever. There are two philosophies regarding this question: according to Mach's principle it is matter that generates geometry of space-time, and according to Wheeler's geometrodynamics some configurations of space-time geometry are to be interpreted as its material content. Neither of these philosophies has led to success. In the present paper, we show that there exists an algebraic generalisation of geometry that reconciles, in a sense, these two seemingly opposite standpoints. The geometry is constructed with the help of a noncommutative algebra of smooth functions on a groupoid and its derivations. The groupoid in question has a nice physical interpretation: it can be regarded as a space of Lorentz rotations. In this way, Lorentz symmetries are inherent to the generalised geometry of space-time. We define the action for this geometry and, by varying it, obtain generalised vacuum Einstein equations (for a simplified model). It turns out that these equations contain additional terms (with respect to the standard vacuum Einstein equations) which are naturally interpreted as the components of the energy-momentum tensor. Matter is thus created out of purely geometric degrees of freedom. We find two exact solutions (for even more simplified case). We argue that the creation of matter, being a global effect, makes the contrast between Mach and Wheeler philosophies ineffective.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
A heuristic sketch how it could fit all together with time

Knud Thomsen

2024-10-25

Abstract:On a scientific meta-level, it is discussed how an overall understanding of the physical universe can be built on the basis of well-proven theories and recent experiments and observations. In the light of almost a century of struggle to make (common) sense of Quantum Mechanics and to reconcile it with General Relativity, it is proposed to (for some time) forget about quantizing gravity or striving for one Theory of Everything or 'Weltformel', which would describe the whole of reality seamlessly without any joints or suture marks. Instead of one single monolithic formalism, a three-legged compound approach is argued for. Quantum Mechanics, Relativity and Thermodynamics are proposed as the main pillars of reality, each with its well-defined realm, specific features, and clearly marked interfaces between the three of them. Not only classical reality, which is rather directly accessible to us, is then comprehensively modelled by their encompassing combination. Quantum phenomena are understood as undoubtedly lying at the bottom of classical physics and at the same time, they become 'fully real' only when embedded in classical frames between preparation and measurement in time. It is then where thermodynamics steps in and provides the mediating glue as it does at interfaces towards gravity. The aim of this short contribution is not to deliver novel quantitative results but rather to propose a comprehensive research program and to coarsely lay out a very roughly coherent self-referential sketch starting from the beginning of the one universe, which we inhabit.

General Physics
The theory of Multiverse, multiplicity of physical objects and physical constants

Alexander K. Gouts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/0210072

2002-10-22

Abstract:The Multiverse is collection of parallel universes. In this article a formal theory and a topos-theoretic models of the multiverse are given. For this the Lawvere-Kock Synthetic Differential Geometry and topos models for smooth infinitesimal analysis are used. Physical properties of multi-variant and many-dimensional parallel universes are discussed. The source of multiplicity of physical objects is set of physical constants.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
A complete, continuous and non-singular expansion of the Universe under stimulated creation -annihilation process of the real scalar Bosons: An introduction to the existence of the Anti Universe and Parallel Universe

Subhayan Maity,Manojit Das

2024-02-04

Abstract:The general theory of relativity is the most popular theory to describe the dynamics of a system (especially the Universe) under gravity. In this framework, the solution of the Einstein field equation under curved space-time yields the cosmic evolution equation. Besides the evolutionary dynamics of the Universe may also be obtained from the other aspects like thermodynamics, classical Lagrangian dynamics, symmetry analysis(Noether, Lie ) etc. This paper presents a new approach to understanding the evolution of the Universe by quantizing the cosmic fluid under gravity. While the general theory of relativity is commonly used to describe the dynamics of the Universe, this paper explores some other aspects of cosmic evolution from the particle creation-annihilation mechanism of the cosmic fluid. The model suggests that the Universe and Anti-Universe can coexist, and that there may be a parallel system (CPT-invariant) of the Universe and Anti-Universe, all of which are created through the adiabatic particle creation-annihilation mechanism of a modified real scalar field acting as the cosmic fluid. This work provides a different approach to obtaining the cosmic evolution equation from the quantum field theory. Also the consequence of the quantization of the cosmic fluid addresses the non-singular origin of the Universe and its continuous complete evolution. Keywords : Evolution of the Universe, Quantum field theory, Cosmology.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Can we debug the Universe?

Apostolos Syropoulos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0910.2859

2009-10-26

Abstract:Roughly, the Church-Turing thesis is a hypothesis that describes exactly what can be computed by any real or feasible conceptual computing device. Generally speaking, the computational metaphor is the idea that everything, including the universe itself, has a computational nature. However, if the Church-Turing thesis is not valid, then does it make sense to expect the construction of a computer program capable of simulating the whole Universe? In the lights of hypercomputation, the scientific discipline that is about computing beyond the Church-Turing barrier, the most natural answer to this question is: No. This note is a justification of this answer and its deeper meaning based on arguments from physics, the philosophy of the mind, and, of course, (hyper)computability theory.

Other Computer Science
A Medieval Multiverse: Mathematical Modelling of the 13th Century Universe of Robert Grosseteste

Richard G. Bower,Tom C. B. McLeish F.R.S.,Brian K. Tanner,Hannah E. Smithson,Cecilia Panti,Neil Lewis,Giles E. M. Gasper

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2014.0025

2014-03-11

Abstract:In his treatise on light, written in about 1225, Robert Grosseteste describes a cosmological model in which the Universe is created in a big-bang like explosion and subsequent condensation. He postulates that the fundamental coupling of light and matter gives rises to the material body of the entire cosmos. Expansion is arrested when matter reaches a minimum density and subsequent emission of light from the outer region leads to compression and rarefaction of the inner bodily mass so as to create nine celestial spheres, with an imperfect residual core. In this paper we reformulate the Latin description in terms of a modern mathematical model. The equations which describe the coupling of light and matter are solved numerically, subject to initial conditions and critical criteria consistent with the text. Formation of a universe with a non-infinite number of perfected spheres is extremely sensitive to the initial conditions, the intensity of the light and the transparency of these spheres. In this "medieval multiverse", only a small range of opacity and initial density profiles lead to a stable universe with nine perfected spheres. As in current cosmological thinking, the existence of Grosseteste's universe relies on a very special combination of fundamental parameters.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Eternal Universes

Damien A. Easson,Joseph E. Lesnefsky

2024-04-04

Abstract:We consider the possibility of a past and future eternal universe, constructing geodesically complete inflating, loitering, and bouncing spacetimes. We identify the constraints energy conditions in General Relativity place on the building of eternal cosmological models. Inflationary and bouncing behavior are shown to be essential ingredients in all significant examples. Non-trivial complete spacetimes are shown to violate the null energy condition (NEC) for at least some amount of time, although, some obey the average null energy condition. Ignoring the intractable subtleties introduced by quantum considerations, such as rare tunneling events and Boltzmann brains, we demonstrate that these universes need not have had a beginning or an end.

High Energy Physics - Theory,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Physical Theories, Eternal Inflation, and Quantum Universe

Yasunori Nomura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11%282011%29063

2011-04-28

Abstract:We present a framework in which well-defined predictions are obtained in an eternally inflating multiverse, based on the principles of quantum mechanics. We show that the entire multiverse is described purely from the viewpoint of a single "observer," who describes the world as a quantum state defined on his/her past light cones bounded by the (stretched) apparent horizons. We find that quantum mechanics plays an essential role in regulating infinities. The framework is "gauge invariant," i.e. predictions do not depend on how spacetime is parametrized, as it should be in a theory of quantum gravity. Our framework provides a fully unified treatment of quantum measurement processes and the multiverse. We conclude that the eternally inflating multiverse and many worlds in quantum mechanics are the same. Other important implications include: global spacetime can be viewed as a derived concept; the multiverse is a transient phenomenon during the world relaxing into a supersymmetric Minkowski state. We also present a theory of "initial conditions" for the multiverse. By extrapolating our framework to the extreme, we arrive at a picture that the entire multiverse is a fluctuation in the stationary, fractal "mega-multiverse," in which an infinite sequence of multiverse productions occurs. The framework discussed here does not suffer from problems/paradoxes plaguing other measures proposed earlier, such as the youngness paradox, the Boltzmann brain problem, and a peculiar "end" of time.

High Energy Physics - Theory,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

How to create a universe

Universe creation on a computer

Joining inner space to outer space

The Duality of the Universe

Solitons as Key Parts to Produce a Universe in the Laboratory

On space-time structure and the Universe: some issues of concept and principle

Unweaving the Fabric of the Universe: The Interplay between Mathematics and Physics

String/M-theories About Our World Are Testable in the traditional Physics Way

Computational universes

Bell's Theory of Beables and the Concept of `Universe'

Can the Universe create itself?

Gambling on the existence of other universes

Creation of Matter in a Noncommutative Universe

A heuristic sketch how it could fit all together with time

The theory of Multiverse, multiplicity of physical objects and physical constants

A complete, continuous and non-singular expansion of the Universe under stimulated creation -annihilation process of the real scalar Bosons: An introduction to the existence of the Anti Universe and Parallel Universe

Can we debug the Universe?

A Medieval Multiverse: Mathematical Modelling of the 13th Century Universe of Robert Grosseteste

Eternal Universes

Physical Theories, Eternal Inflation, and Quantum Universe