Abstract:Objective: Introduction: The article is devoted to the research of topical issues of ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders and who are subject to criminal proceedings on the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter - CMM). The research was conducted in the context of international standards and interpretative practice of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECHR or the Court). The aim: The aim of this study is to analyze international acts concerning the protection of the rights of mentally ill persons when applying compulsory medical measures; to highlight and analyze the ECHR's key positions in the context of respect for the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 § 1 (e) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the Convention)) and the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention) in criminal proceedings concerning the use of CMM; to analyse the law enforcement practice and activities of psychiatrist experts on compliance with European standards for the protection of the rights of persons with mental disorders who are subject to criminal proceedings. Patients and methods: Materials and methods: rescent scientific researches; provisions of international legal acts in the field of psychiatric care; the legal standpoint of the ECHR in respecting the rights of persons with mental disorders (15 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR addressed these issues in the context of the requirements of Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention); criminal procedural legislation of foreign states (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, Estonia, Uzbekistan, Germany); the results of the survey of 20 psychiatrists and experts conducted by the authors were used in this article To achieve this aim of research process a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition, including comparative and legal method, system and structural method, method of generalization, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert evaluation, etc. bein used. Results: Results: summarized and generalized ECHR's standpoints concerning: a) minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and imprisoned; b) the aspects taken into account by the ECHR within each minimum condition in the context of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention); c) the peculiarities of the personal participation of an individual with a mental disorder in the judicial review of the application of CMM in terms of observing its right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention). The degree of extrapolation of these standpoints to the activity of psychiatrists was identified and analyzed. Conclusion: Conclusions: the current practice of applying CMM in criminal proceedings does not fully comply with the international standards and legal positions of the ECHR in terms of providing a person with a mental disorder the right to liberty and security of person and the right to a fair trial (in particular, the minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and be imprisoned are not always met).

The influence of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities on the European court of human rights in the area of mental health law: Divergence and unexplored potential

Application of the Paternalism Principle to Constitutional Rights: Mental Health Case-Law in Ireland

The CRPD and mental health law reform in Scotland

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

Multi-level protection of rights: India's Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 and the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Articles 12 and 14)

European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings

MEDICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES OF OBSERVING THE RIGHTS OF A PERSON WITH A MENTAL ILLNESS WHO HAS BECOME A PARTICIPANT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

[Involuntary treatment of mental patients in the community: legal and ethical dilemmas]

Legal capacity, mental capacity and supported decision-making: Report from a panel event

Protecting the fair trial rights of mentally disordered defendants in criminal proceedings: Exploring the need for further EU action

The compulsory psychiatric regime in Hong Kong: Constitutional and ethical perspectives

Defining Disability in the European Union Nondiscrimination Legislation: Judicial Activism and Legislative Restraints

A narrative review of international legislation regulating fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility: Is there a perfect system?

Post-traumatic stress disorder, human rights and access to healthcare: an analysis of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from an ethical perspective

The use of specialized (medical) knowledge in the criminal process: the practice of the European Court of Human Rights

Schizophrenia, human rights and access to health care: A systematic search and review of judgements by the European Court of Human Rights

(Un)blurred lines? Sex, disability, and the dynamic boundaries of mental capacity law

Medical Treatment and Expression of the Consent of the Elderly Not Able to Consent: A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law in the Countries of the Council of Europe

Professional Values and Mental Health Tribunals: How Healthcare Professionals' and Lawyers' Views Are Shaped by Values, and How This Might Impede Reform

Legal protection of the right to work and employment for persons with mental health problems: a review of legislation across the world

Between facts and norms: Testing compliance with Article 8 ECHR in immigration cases