Abstract:Objective: Introduction: The article is devoted to the research of topical issues of ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders and who are subject to criminal proceedings on the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter - CMM). The research was conducted in the context of international standards and interpretative practice of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECHR or the Court). The aim: The aim of this study is to analyze international acts concerning the protection of the rights of mentally ill persons when applying compulsory medical measures; to highlight and analyze the ECHR's key positions in the context of respect for the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 § 1 (e) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the Convention)) and the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention) in criminal proceedings concerning the use of CMM; to analyse the law enforcement practice and activities of psychiatrist experts on compliance with European standards for the protection of the rights of persons with mental disorders who are subject to criminal proceedings. Patients and methods: Materials and methods: rescent scientific researches; provisions of international legal acts in the field of psychiatric care; the legal standpoint of the ECHR in respecting the rights of persons with mental disorders (15 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR addressed these issues in the context of the requirements of Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention); criminal procedural legislation of foreign states (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, Estonia, Uzbekistan, Germany); the results of the survey of 20 psychiatrists and experts conducted by the authors were used in this article To achieve this aim of research process a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition, including comparative and legal method, system and structural method, method of generalization, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert evaluation, etc. bein used. Results: Results: summarized and generalized ECHR's standpoints concerning: a) minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and imprisoned; b) the aspects taken into account by the ECHR within each minimum condition in the context of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention); c) the peculiarities of the personal participation of an individual with a mental disorder in the judicial review of the application of CMM in terms of observing its right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention). The degree of extrapolation of these standpoints to the activity of psychiatrists was identified and analyzed. Conclusion: Conclusions: the current practice of applying CMM in criminal proceedings does not fully comply with the international standards and legal positions of the ECHR in terms of providing a person with a mental disorder the right to liberty and security of person and the right to a fair trial (in particular, the minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and be imprisoned are not always met).

A narrative review of international legislation regulating fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility: Is there a perfect system?

AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial

On the Social Treatment System of Mentally Disabled Offenders

European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings

Discussion on the Mental Health Law (draft)—from the Perspective of Forensic Appraisal

Ethical issues in forensic psychiatric research on mentally disordered offenders

Mental health and justice beyond borders: Global crises, sociopolitical determinants, and contemporary practices in forensic psychiatry

The compulsory psychiatric regime in Hong Kong: Constitutional and ethical perspectives

Professional Values and Mental Health Tribunals: How Healthcare Professionals' and Lawyers' Views Are Shaped by Values, and How This Might Impede Reform

Restrictive measures in forensic mental health and their role in recovery: a narrative literature review

A review of the new provisions for sanctioning mentally disordered offenders in China, in a broader historical context

Forensic mental health in Kuwait: filling the gaps

PRESUMPTION OF MENTAL HEALTH VS FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION REPORT: MEDICAL AND LEGAL ASPECT

MEDICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES OF OBSERVING THE RIGHTS OF A PERSON WITH A MENTAL ILLNESS WHO HAS BECOME A PARTICIPANT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Protecting the fair trial rights of mentally disordered defendants in criminal proceedings: Exploring the need for further EU action

Fitness to stand trial: 415 consecutive defendants assessed by a New Zealand forensic psychiatry service

MENTAL ILLNESS TREATMENT IN LAW: ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH

Legally involved individuals in state hospitals and community mental health settings: Introduction to the special section.

Mental health interventions for individuals with serious mental illness in the criminal legal system: a systematic review

Comparing legislation for involuntary admission and treatment of mental illness in four South Asian countries

The effect of legal representation on clinical measures in involuntarily admitted psychiatric patients: a retrospective study