Abstract:Objective: Introduction: The article is devoted to the research of topical issues of ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders and who are subject to criminal proceedings on the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter - CMM). The research was conducted in the context of international standards and interpretative practice of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECHR or the Court). The aim: The aim of this study is to analyze international acts concerning the protection of the rights of mentally ill persons when applying compulsory medical measures; to highlight and analyze the ECHR's key positions in the context of respect for the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 § 1 (e) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the Convention)) and the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention) in criminal proceedings concerning the use of CMM; to analyse the law enforcement practice and activities of psychiatrist experts on compliance with European standards for the protection of the rights of persons with mental disorders who are subject to criminal proceedings. Patients and methods: Materials and methods: rescent scientific researches; provisions of international legal acts in the field of psychiatric care; the legal standpoint of the ECHR in respecting the rights of persons with mental disorders (15 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR addressed these issues in the context of the requirements of Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention); criminal procedural legislation of foreign states (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, Estonia, Uzbekistan, Germany); the results of the survey of 20 psychiatrists and experts conducted by the authors were used in this article To achieve this aim of research process a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition, including comparative and legal method, system and structural method, method of generalization, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert evaluation, etc. bein used. Results: Results: summarized and generalized ECHR's standpoints concerning: a) minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and imprisoned; b) the aspects taken into account by the ECHR within each minimum condition in the context of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention); c) the peculiarities of the personal participation of an individual with a mental disorder in the judicial review of the application of CMM in terms of observing its right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention). The degree of extrapolation of these standpoints to the activity of psychiatrists was identified and analyzed. Conclusion: Conclusions: the current practice of applying CMM in criminal proceedings does not fully comply with the international standards and legal positions of the ECHR in terms of providing a person with a mental disorder the right to liberty and security of person and the right to a fair trial (in particular, the minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and be imprisoned are not always met).

The use of specialized (medical) knowledge in the criminal process: the practice of the European Court of Human Rights

European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AS PATIENT'S PROTECTION MEASURE IN JUDICIAL PRACTICE

TECHNICAL MEANS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS)

PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE (REVIEW)

Compliance with the procedural form during the expert examination in criminal proceedings

Legality of Applying Coercive Medical Measures in Criminal Law

[THE LEGAL STATUS OF A PSYCHIATRIC EXPERT DURING A FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC EXPERTISE]

FORENSIC AND LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE OF HYPNOSIS DURING A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION

SOME ISSUES OF SAFETY AND LABOR PROTECTION IN DECISIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS)

Forensic standardizations in torture and death in custody investigations

International legal standards for conducting biomedical experiments on animals: status and prospects of development

CURRENT PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE STATUS OF A SPECIALIST IN THE CONTEXT OF INTRODUCING CHANGES TO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW

Using Special Knowledge: History, Status and Prospects of Development

Specificity of special knowledge use by the defense attorney in criminal proceedings

Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria

The specifics of the interpretation of non-performance or improper performance by medical or pharmaceutical employees of their professional duties, taking into account the practice of the ECHR

The role of the convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms and the practice of the European court of human rights in performing law enforcement activities in Ukraine

Somatic human rights in the process of biomedical research: analysis of scientific sources

PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL MEDICAL INFORMATION IN UKRAINE: PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION

The use of special knowledge during the investigation of forgery of documents that are submitted for state registration of a legal entity and individual entrepreneurs