Compliance with the procedural form during the expert examination in criminal proceedings

A.A. Blagodyr,V.S. Blahodyr,S.M. Blagodyr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.03.64
2023-07-18
Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence
Abstract:The paper examines issues related to the problems of compliance with the procedural form during the appointment and conduct of expert examination in criminal proceedings.Attention is drawn to the fact that the importance of the procedural form is difficult to overestimate, as it is one of the most important guarantees of criminal justice, which is aimed at ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of all persons participating in the proceedings. Criminal procedural form is the law defined order of criminal proceedings in general, the order of execution of individual procedural actions, and the order of making procedural decisions. The requirement to observe the criminal procedural form applies to all subjects of procedural activity, but it especially applies to the prosecution and the court, given the requirements of part 2 of Article 19 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which establishes the duty of state authorities and local self-government bodies, their officials to act only on the basis, within the limits of authority and in the manner provided by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine.It was found that one of the most common mistakes made by pre-trial investigation bodies during the examination is the violation of the established form of making a procedural decision. Decisions on the selection of biological samples for expert research, in violation of the requirements of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, are made not by prosecutors authorized to do so, but by investigators or heads of investigative units. It is also a violation of the procedural form to participate in the investigation and, accordingly, to resolve all issues related to the appointment and conduct of the examination, by persons who are not endowed with such powers.Attention is drawn to the fact that, contrary to the decisions of the ECHR, cases of courts issuing decisions on granting permission for the forced selection of biological samples for conducting expert examinations of suspects continue.It was concluded that pre-trial investigation bodies and courts in their activities must strictly follow the procedural form established by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. When deciding on the appointment and conduct of an examination, it is necessary to take into account the legal positions of the Supreme Court and the decisions of the ECHR. In order to bring domestic criminal procedural legislation to international standards in the field of protection of personal rights, additions should be introduced to the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, which relate to the prohibition of forced collection of biological samples for examination of suspects and accused persons.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?