Effects of Dentifrices With Antierosive Potential on the Surface of Bovine Enamel Submitted to Acidic Beverage

Guilherme Silva dos Santos,Amanda Ferreira Felix,Iago César Ribeiro Teles Matos,Gabriela Luiza Moreira Carvalho,Carolina Bosso André,Matheus Kury,Vanessa Cavalli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13327
2024-10-10
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Abstract:Objectives To evaluate the effects of dentifrices containing sodium fluoride (NaF) combined with NovaMin (Sensodyne Repair & Protect—SRP), NaF combined with stannous fluoride (SnF2, Oral‐B Pro‐Gengiva—OBP), and amine fluoride (AmF, Colgate Elmex—ELM) on enamel subjected to simulated erosive cycling. Materials and Methods Bovine enamel‐dentin discs (n = 10/group) were subjected to erosive cycling with orange juice (pH = 3.29, 5 min, 3x/day), artificial saliva (SA–2 h, 3x/day and overnight) and treated with dentifrice (2 min, 2x/day) or without treatment (CONT). Surface microhardness (SMH) was evaluated at baseline (T0), on the first (T1) and fifth (T5) days. SMH loss (%SHL) was calculated. Surface roughness (Ra, μm) was determined at T0 and T5. Morphology and mineral content were evaluated under scanning electron microscopy and energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy. Data were analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey or Bonferroni (α = 5%). Results No differences in %SHL were detected among groups at T1. At T5, OBP promoted %SHL, Ra, and ΔRa significantly lower than all the other groups (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?