Abstract:In recent years, there has been a decline in the quality of statistical analyses conducted on various fields of medicine in the submitted articles 1 . According to Zapf et al., biostatisticians take part in the preparation of appropriate and effective study designs and monitor their course. They are responsible for planning, conducting data analysis, and interpreting and publishing the results 2 . The latest published results show that only 39% of the 2600 accepted articles on various aspects of COVID-19 are statistically correct, which unfortunately may jeopardize the credibility of biomedical research 3 . A 1998 study by Goodman et al. found that 33% of 114 biomedical journals surveyed used a statistical review for all original articles, and 46% used a statistical review at the editor's discretion 4 . Unfortunately, no significant changes took place over the next 20 years. In an article from 2020, published in PLOS ONE, the authors stated that only 34% (36/107) of journal editors rarely or never use a specialized statistical review. Furthermore, 55% of the surveyed respondents said they paid for a statistical reviewer 5 , however, according to Goodman and colleagues, it was about one-third, which is much less 4 . The conducted research is limited in terms of the sparse number of respondents. Due to the low number of statistical reviewers, rewarding this group of people is often necessary. However, these types of people are employed primarily by more prestigious magazines that have the financial resources for this specific purpose. For this reason, it seems advisable to publish recommendations for medical journals regarding ways to find and encourage statistical reviewers to conduct an expert review of the submitted manuscript regarding the performed statistical analysis. Otherwise, there is a high probability that the situation will not change in the near future.

Publishing an applied statistics paper: Guidance and advice from editors

Publishing in high quality journals: perspectives from overworked and unpaid reviewers

Getting published: Suggestions and strategies from editors of sport and exercise psychology journals

A Pragmatic Approach to Getting Published: 35 Tips for Early Career Researchers

Mastering the scientific peer review process: tips for young authors from a young senior editor

Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines

Publishing Without Perishing: A Guide to the Successful Reporting of Clinical Data

Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact

Exploring the Black Box of Journal Manuscript Review: A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors

Editorial: How to develop a quality research article and avoid a journal desk rejection

Editorial: What Makes for a Great Applications and Case Studies Paper?

How to write an effective journal peer review using a staged writing approach: a best-practice guide for early-career researchers

Pathways to publishing a scientific article: listen to the editor

How to Write and Publish Quality Articles? Insights for Early-Stage Researchers

[How to publish in pediatrics journals with impact factor: Role of open access journals]

The rites of writing papers: steps to successful publishing for psychiatrists

Recommendations to medical journals on ways to encourage statistical experts to review submissions

Tips and tricks for writing a manuscript to publish in a biomedical journal

Writing a better research article

Comparing the Publication Process in Accounting, Economics, Finance, Management, Marketing, Psychology, and the Natural Sciences

Successfully Publishing With Undergraduate Coauthors in Psychology: Insights From Faculty With Top Track Records